Hérault Élodie, Bravo Gina, Trottier Lise
University Institute of Geriatrics of Sherbrooke.
Université de Sherbrooke.
IRB. 2018 Sep-Oct;40(5):11-19.
Surrogates' decisions and advance directives currently offer the best opportunities for people to participate in research at times of decisional incapacity. We investigated which of these options better reflects an older adult's willingness to engage in research should he or she be solicited to enroll in a study after losing the capacity to consent. Data were drawn from a recently completed trial in which older adults were invited to record their research advance directives in a booklet designed for that purpose. Three vignettes describing hypothetical studies were later used to elicit older adults' willingness to engage in these studies. Statistical analyses involved comparing surrogates' and advance directives' ability to predict the older adults' answers. No significant differences in agreement with older adults' hypothetical choices were found between surrogates and advance directives (p-values ranged from 0.164 to 0.720). Future studies could test whether more specific forms of research advance directives would assist surrogates in making research-related decisions for their loved ones.
代理人决策和预先指示目前为人们在丧失决策能力时参与研究提供了最佳机会。我们调查了如果老年人在失去同意能力后被邀请参加一项研究,这两种选择中哪一种能更好地反映其参与研究的意愿。数据来自最近完成的一项试验,在该试验中,邀请老年人在为此目的设计的小册子中记录他们的研究预先指示。后来使用三个描述假设性研究的 vignettes 来引出老年人参与这些研究的意愿。统计分析包括比较代理人和预先指示预测老年人答案的能力。在代理人和预先指示之间,与老年人假设选择的一致性方面没有发现显著差异(p 值范围从 0.164 到 0.720)。未来的研究可以测试更具体形式的研究预先指示是否会帮助代理人就其亲人的研究相关决策提供帮助。