Rapacioli Melina, Fiszer de Plazas Sara, Flores Vladimir
Grupo Interdisciplinario de Biología Teórica, Instituto de Neurociencia Cognitiva y Traslacional (INCyT), Universidad Favaloro-INECO-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Instituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencias (IBCN) Dr. Eduardo de Robertis, Facultad de Medicina, CONICET, Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Int J Dev Neurosci. 2019 Apr;73:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
The present article summarizes the main events involved in the isthmic organizer and optic tectum determination and analyses how optic tectum patterning is translated, by the organized operation of several specific cell behaviors, into the terminally differentiated optic tectum. The paper proposes that this assembling of temporally/spatially organized cell behaviors could be incorporated into a wider notion of patterning and that, given the asymmetric organization of the developing optic tectum, the notion of "sensitive period" does not capture the whole complexity of midbrain development and the pathogenesis of congenital disorders. The cell behaviors involved in the optic tectum development are organized in time and space by the isthmic organizer. A comprehensive description of the normal optic tectum development, and also its alterations, should consider both domains. Significantly, the identity of each neuronal cohort depends critically on its "time and place of birth". Both parameters must be considered at once to explain how the structural and functional organization of the optic tectum is elaborated. The notion of "patterning" applies only to the early events of the optic tectum development. Besides, the notion of "sensitive period" considers only a temporal domain and disregards the asymmetric organization of the developing optic tectum. The present paper proposes that these notions might be re-defined: (a) a wider meaning of the term patterning and (b) a replacement of the term "sensitive period" by a more precise concept of "sensitive temporal/spatial window".
本文总结了峡部组织者和视顶盖确定过程中涉及的主要事件,并分析了视顶盖模式如何通过几种特定细胞行为的有序运作转化为终末分化的视顶盖。本文提出,这种时间/空间上有序的细胞行为的组装可以纳入更广泛的模式形成概念,并且鉴于发育中的视顶盖的不对称组织,“敏感期”概念并未涵盖中脑发育和先天性疾病发病机制的全部复杂性。视顶盖发育中涉及的细胞行为在时间和空间上由峡部组织者组织。对视顶盖正常发育及其改变的全面描述应同时考虑这两个方面。重要的是,每个神经元群体的身份关键取决于其“出生时间和地点”。必须同时考虑这两个参数,以解释视顶盖的结构和功能组织是如何形成的。“模式形成”概念仅适用于视顶盖发育的早期事件。此外,“敏感期”概念仅考虑了时间方面,而忽略了发育中的视顶盖的不对称组织。本文提出,这些概念可能需要重新定义:(a) 模式形成一词的更广泛含义,以及 (b) 用更精确的“敏感时间/空间窗口”概念取代“敏感期”一词。