Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co, Ltd, 6-7-5 Minatojima Chuou-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan.
Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co, Ltd, 6-7-5 Minatojima Chuou-ku, Kobe, Hyogo 650-0047, Japan.
Int J Pharm. 2019 Feb 25;557:18-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.12.029. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
The Green fluidized bed granulation (GFBG) technology is based on the moisture activated dry granulation (MADG) technique and consists only of a mixing and a spraying process using a fluidized bed granulator, requiring no heating process. This provides a less energy-consuming and environment-friendly granulation method compared to current fluidized bed granulation (FBG) and high-shear granulation (HSG) methods. The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate the manufacturability, and granule and tablet properties among GFBG, MADG, FBG and HSG. The GFBG process time took less than 20 min for producing final blends at a 700 g scale, which was comparable to MADG. This process time was significantly shorter than that of FBG and HSG. GFBG not only had the shortest process time but also reduced the number of manufacturing machines compared to FBG and HSG. The Hausner ratio (HR) of granules from GFBG (1.30) indicated a good flowability, and no problems were observed in the tablet mass variability during compression. Tablets produced using GFBG achieved sufficient tensile strength (>1.5 MPa) even at a low compression force and demonstrated the fastest disintegration time compared to the other manufacturing methods. Tablet disintegration is related to wettability and porosity, therefore the tablet wettability (initial and capillary wetting) and tablet porosity were investigated. As a result, the capillary wetting of the tablets produced using GFBG was 3.6 times higher than the tablets produced using FBG, which might have affected the fast disintegration of the tablets produced using GFBG.
绿色流化床造粒(GFBG)技术基于水分激活干法造粒(MADG)技术,仅由使用流化床造粒机的混合和喷涂过程组成,无需加热过程。与目前的流化床造粒(FBG)和高剪切造粒(HSG)方法相比,这种方法提供了一种能耗更低、对环境更友好的造粒方法。本研究旨在比较和评估 GFBG、MADG、FBG 和 HSG 在可制造性、颗粒和片剂特性方面的差异。GFBG 工艺时间在 700g 规模下生产最终混合物不到 20 分钟,与 MADG 相当。这一时间比 FBG 和 HSG 短得多。GFBG 不仅具有最短的工艺时间,而且与 FBG 和 HSG 相比,还减少了制造机器的数量。GFBG 制得的颗粒的 Hausner 比(HR)为 1.30,表明其具有良好的流动性,在压缩过程中片剂质量变异性方面没有问题。使用 GFBG 生产的片剂即使在低压缩力下也能达到足够的拉伸强度(>1.5MPa),并且与其他制造方法相比,显示出最快的崩解时间。片剂崩解与润湿性和孔隙率有关,因此研究了片剂的润湿性(初始润湿性和毛细润湿性)和片剂孔隙率。结果表明,使用 GFBG 生产的片剂的毛细润湿性比使用 FBG 生产的片剂高 3.6 倍,这可能影响了使用 GFBG 生产的片剂的快速崩解。