Bandyk D F, Moldenhauer P, Lipchik E, Schreiber E, Pohl L, Cato R, Towne J B
Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee.
J Vasc Surg. 1988 Dec;8(6):696-702.
The results of duplex ultrasonography in grading stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (78 sites) were compared with those of contrast angiography in 71 patients studied for recurrent or contralateral occlusive disease of the carotid bifurcation. Duplex and angiographic studies were performed within one month of each other at a mean postoperative interval of 44 months (range 3 to 122 months). Stenosis of the common carotid (CCA) and internal carotid artery (ICA) was classified into five disease categories (normal or less than 15% diameter reduction [DR], 16% to 49% DR, 50% to 75% DR, greater than 75% DR, and occlusion). The overall accuracy of duplex scanning compared with angiography in predicting recurrent carotid bifurcation disease was 83%, a level of agreement similar to classification of disease involving the nonoperated, contralateral bifurcation (overall accuracy 87%). Recurrent stenosis (greater than 50% DR) or occlusion of the CCA or ICA after endarterectomy was identified with an accuracy of 97%. Overestimation of severity of recurrent stenosis accounted for 11 of 13 duplex classification errors (85%). Presence of moderate (30% to 50% DR) recurrent stenosis of the CCA, tortuosity of the ICA, and severe contralateral carotid bifurcation disease were associated with velocity spectra that predicted a more severe recurrent stenosis at the endarterectomy site compared with angiographic grading. The level of agreement between duplex scanning and angiography was comparable to the interobserver variability in angiographic interpretation. The accuracy reported justifies the use of duplex scanning to grade the severity of carotid bifurcation recurrent stenosis and to follow these lesions for disease progression.
对71例因颈动脉分叉处复发性或对侧闭塞性疾病而接受研究的患者,将其颈动脉内膜切除术后(78个部位)双功超声检查评估狭窄程度的结果与造影血管造影的结果进行了比较。双功超声检查和血管造影检查在彼此1个月内进行,术后平均间隔时间为44个月(范围3至122个月)。将颈总动脉(CCA)和颈内动脉(ICA)的狭窄分为五类疾病(正常或直径缩小小于15%[DR]、16%至49% DR、50%至75% DR、大于75% DR和闭塞)。与血管造影相比,双功扫描预测颈动脉分叉处复发性疾病的总体准确率为83%,这一一致程度与未手术的对侧分叉处疾病分类相似(总体准确率87%)。内膜切除术后CCA或ICA复发性狭窄(大于50% DR)或闭塞的识别准确率为97%。双功分类错误的13例中有11例(85%)是对复发性狭窄严重程度的高估。CCA中度(30%至50% DR)复发性狭窄、ICA迂曲以及严重的对侧颈动脉分叉处疾病的存在与速度频谱相关,与血管造影分级相比,这些速度频谱预测内膜切除部位的复发性狭窄更严重。双功扫描与血管造影之间的一致程度与血管造影解读中的观察者间变异性相当。所报告的准确率证明了使用双功扫描来评估颈动脉分叉处复发性狭窄的严重程度并随访这些病变的疾病进展情况是合理的。