Suppr超能文献

经皮左心耳封堵术后器械相关血栓形成的发生率及临床影响:一项荟萃分析。

Incidence and Clinical Impact of Device-Related Thrombus Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia School of Medicine, Morgantown, West Virginia.

出版信息

JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018 Dec;4(12):1629-1637. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the incidence and clinical impact of device related thrombus (DRT) following precautions left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO).

BACKGROUND

Device-related thrombus is a known complication of LAAO. However, data on the incidence of DRT and its impact on outcomes are limited.

METHODS

The authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies to calculate the pooled incidence of DRT and the pooled odds ratio (OR) of ischemic events in patients with DRT and those without DRT.

RESULTS

In the 66 included studies; the incidence of DRT was 351/10, 153 (3.8%, range 0% to 17%, I = 56.8). The diagnosis was made in <90, 90 to 365, and >365 days in 42%, 57%, and 1% of patients, respectively. There was no difference in DRT rates between the AMPLATZER (AMPLATZER, AGA Medical Corporation, Golden Valley, Minnesota) and WATCHMAN (WATCHMAN, Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, Massachusetts) devices (3.6% vs. 3.1%, p = 0.24). In a meta-regression, age, gender, heart failure, diabetes, CHADS-VASc score, previous stroke, and post-LAAO antithrombotic regimen did not explain the heterogeneity in the incidence of DRT. The pooled incidence of ischemic events in studies that compared outcomes of patients with and without DRT (32 studies; n = 7,689) was 13.2% (37 of 280) in patients with DRT and 3.8% (285 of 7,399) in those without DRT (OR: 5.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.66 to 7.59; p < 0.001, I = 0). In a sensitivity analysis including randomized trials and prospective multicenter registries, the incidence of DRT was 3.7%, and DRT remained associated with higher rates of ischemic events (13.5% vs. 4.4%, OR: 4.15, 95% CI: 2.77 to 6.22; p < 0.001, I = 0).

CONCLUSIONS

DRT after LAAO is uncommon (3.8%) but is associated with a 4- to 5-fold increase in ischemic events. Further studies are needed to understand the underlying mechanisms and the optimal surveillance and management of DRT.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估左心耳封堵(LAAO)后器械相关血栓(DRT)的发生率和临床影响。

背景

器械相关血栓是 LAAO 的已知并发症。然而,关于 DRT 的发生率及其对结局影响的数据有限。

方法

作者对随机和观察性研究进行了荟萃分析,以计算 DRT 的汇总发生率以及 DRT 患者和无 DRT 患者发生缺血事件的汇总优势比(OR)。

结果

在纳入的 66 项研究中;DRT 的发生率为 351/10,153(3.8%,范围 0%至 17%,I=56.8)。分别有 42%、57%和 1%的患者在<90、90 至 365 和>365 天诊断出 DRT。AMPLATZER(AMPLATZER,AGA Medical Corporation,明尼苏达州 Golden Valley)和 WATCHMAN(WATCHMAN,波士顿科学公司,马萨诸塞州 Marlborough)装置的 DRT 发生率无差异(3.6% vs. 3.1%,p=0.24)。在一项荟萃回归分析中,年龄、性别、心力衰竭、糖尿病、CHADS-VASc 评分、既往卒中以及 LAAO 后抗血栓治疗方案并不能解释 DRT 发生率的异质性。在比较有 DRT 和无 DRT 患者结局的 32 项研究(n=7,689)中,有 DRT 的患者发生缺血事件的汇总发生率为 13.2%(37/280),无 DRT 的患者为 3.8%(285/7,399)(OR:5.27,95%置信区间[CI]:3.66 至 7.59;p<0.001,I=0)。在一项包括随机试验和前瞻性多中心注册研究的敏感性分析中,DRT 的发生率为 3.7%,且 DRT 仍与更高的缺血事件发生率相关(13.5% vs. 4.4%,OR:4.15,95%CI:2.77 至 6.22;p<0.001,I=0)。

结论

LAAO 后 DRT 并不常见(3.8%),但与缺血事件增加 4-5 倍相关。需要进一步研究以了解 DRT 的潜在机制以及 DRT 的最佳监测和管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验