• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
An Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Approach to Evaluate New Laboratory Tests.一种基于证据的实验室医学方法来评估新的实验室检测
EJIFCC. 2018 Dec 5;29(4):259-263. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Sepsis Care Pathway 2019.2019年脓毒症护理路径
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):4. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.4. eCollection 2019.
3
4
Evaluation of molecular techniques in prediction and diagnosis of cytomegalovirus disease in immunocompromised patients.免疫功能低下患者巨细胞病毒病预测与诊断中分子技术的评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Apr;10(10):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta10100.
5
6
From biomarkers to medical tests: the changing landscape of test evaluation.从生物标志物到医学检验:检验评估的变化态势。
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Jan 1;427:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
7
8
[Evidence-based laboratory medicine].[循证检验医学]
Orv Hetil. 2003 May 4;144(18):869-76.
9
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: Part 2 of 3. The GRADE approach to grading quality of evidence about diagnostic tests and strategies.临床实践指南中证据质量分级与推荐强度:第3部分之第2部分。诊断试验和策略证据质量分级的GRADE方法。
Allergy. 2009 Aug;64(8):1109-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02083.x. Epub 2009 May 29.
10
Clinical Practice Guideline: Sudden Hearing Loss (Update).临床实践指南:突发性聋(更新)。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Aug;161(1_suppl):S1-S45. doi: 10.1177/0194599819859885.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical guide for identifying unmet clinical needs for biomarkers.识别生物标志物未满足临床需求的实用指南。
EJIFCC. 2018 Jul 11;29(2):129-137. eCollection 2018 Jul.
2
Biomarker development targeting unmet clinical needs.针对未满足的临床需求的生物标志物开发。
Clin Chim Acta. 2016 Sep 1;460:211-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.06.037. Epub 2016 Jun 30.
3
Developing GRADE outcome-based recommendations about diagnostic tests: a key role in laboratory medicine policies.制定基于GRADE结果的诊断试验建议:在检验医学政策中的关键作用。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016 Apr;54(4):535-43. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2015-0867.
4
Applying Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) to diagnostic tests was challenging but doable.将推荐评估、制定与评估(GRADE)应用于诊断测试具有一定挑战性,但并非不可行。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jul;67(7):760-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.01.006. Epub 2014 Apr 13.
5
Promoting clinical and laboratory interaction by harmonization.通过协调促进临床与实验室之间的互动。
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 May 15;432:15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.051. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
6
From biomarkers to medical tests: the changing landscape of test evaluation.从生物标志物到医学检验:检验评估的变化态势。
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 Jan 1;427:49-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.09.018. Epub 2013 Sep 27.
7
Harmonization of laboratory testing - Current achievements and future strategies.实验室检测的协调统一——当前成果与未来策略
Clin Chim Acta. 2014 May 15;432:4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
8
When diagnostic testing leads to harm: a new outcomes-based approach for laboratory medicine.当诊断检测造成伤害时:实验室医学基于新结果的方法。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):ii6-ii10. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001621. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
9
Uncertainties in baseline risk estimates and confidence in treatment effects.基线风险估计的不确定性和对治疗效果的信心。
BMJ. 2012 Nov 14;345:e7401. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7401.
10
Implementation of standardization in clinical practice: not always an easy task.临床实践中的标准化实施:并非易事。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2012 Feb 29;50(7):1237-41. doi: 10.1515/cclm.2011.791.

一种基于证据的实验室医学方法来评估新的实验室检测

An Evidence-Based Laboratory Medicine Approach to Evaluate New Laboratory Tests.

作者信息

Trenti Tommaso

机构信息

Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University Hospital and Local Healthcare Unit of Modena, Italy.

出版信息

EJIFCC. 2018 Dec 5;29(4):259-263. eCollection 2018 Dec.

PMID:30574035
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6295590/
Abstract

The evidence-based recommendations for the evaluation of new tests to be used in practice are a key issue to improve diagnostic clinical pathway inducing effective care. Emerging precision or personalized medicine requires innovative and pioneering biomarker tests for molecularly targeted therapies, possibly fitted for the individual patient's condition. Beyond the traditional analytical specifications that should guarantee the proper clinical diagnostic performances in response to a specific clinical question, the outcomes of a new test should be clearly defined and evaluated. Analytical and diagnostic performances such as sensitivity, specificity, imprecision, positive and negative predictive values are traditionally established measures but the clinical impact and the healthcare outcomes, to which these accuracy measures are related, are complex to measure. The extent of the improvement of the patients' health due to a diagnostic test remains a "holy grail" notwithstanding it should be the ultimate goal.

摘要

评估实际应用中的新检测方法的循证建议是改善诊断临床路径以实现有效治疗的关键问题。新兴的精准医学或个性化医学需要用于分子靶向治疗的创新型和开拓性生物标志物检测,可能要适合个体患者的病情。除了应保证针对特定临床问题具有适当临床诊断性能的传统分析规范外,新检测方法的结果也应明确界定和评估。灵敏度、特异性、不精密度、阳性和阴性预测值等分析和诊断性能是传统的既定指标,但这些准确性指标所关联的临床影响和医疗保健结果却难以衡量。尽管诊断检测对患者健康的改善程度应是最终目标,但它仍是一个“圣杯”。