He Qibin, Wang Lei, Peng Chunyan, Zou Xiaoping, Zhan Qiang, Xu Yaping, Liu Qiang, Qian Junbo, Gong Lei, Shen Yingzhou, Chen Jianping
Department of Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China.
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018 Dec;6(10):1519-1526. doi: 10.1177/2050640618804729. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
Prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement effectively reduces post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in high-risk patients, but the optimal stent remains unclear. We modified a 5-Fr, 3 cm pancreatic stent by removing the flange on the pancreatic side and compared the rate of spontaneous dislodgement and complications with the ordinary stent.
This was a randomized controlled trial at six tertiary endoscopic centers. Patients deemed high risk for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis randomly received modified or ordinary pancreatic stent. The primary outcome was spontaneous stent dislodgement at five days and 14 days. Secondary outcomes were the success rate of stent placement and complications.
A total of 276 patients were randomly assigned to receive modified stents (mS group) and ordinary stents (oS group). The placement of a pancreatic stent was successful in all 276 patients. There were no significant differences between groups with respect to age, sex, major diagnosis, or indications for stenting. At five days the spontaneous dislodgement rate was 47.72% for the mS group and 15.67% for the oS group (<0.001); at 14 days the rates were 84.21% and 42.65%, respectively ( < 0.001). Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis occurred in 6.52% of all patients. There were no significant differences regarding the incidences of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis, hemorrhage or fever.
The modified short 5-Fr stent has a higher spontaneous dislodgement rate than ordinary pancreatic stent, thus obviating the need for endoscopic removal. The modified pancreatic stent does not increase the incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis or other complications. The endoscopist can consider removing the flange on the pancreatic duct side for prophylactic pancreatic duct manipulation.
预防性胰管支架置入可有效降低高危患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的发生率,但最佳支架仍不明确。我们通过去除胰侧的凸缘对一种5Fr、3cm的胰管支架进行了改良,并将其自发移位率和并发症发生率与普通支架进行了比较。
这是一项在六个三级内镜中心进行的随机对照试验。被认为内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎高危的患者被随机分配接受改良或普通胰管支架。主要结局是支架在5天和14天时的自发移位情况。次要结局是支架置入成功率和并发症情况。
共有276例患者被随机分配接受改良支架(mS组)和普通支架(oS组)。所有276例患者的胰管支架置入均成功。两组在年龄、性别、主要诊断或支架置入指征方面无显著差异。在5天时,mS组的自发移位率为47.72%,oS组为15.67%(<0.001);在14天时,发生率分别为84.21%和42.65%(<0.001)。所有患者中内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎的发生率为6.52%。在内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎、出血或发热的发生率方面无显著差异。
改良的短5Fr支架的自发移位率高于普通胰管支架,因此无需内镜取出。改良的胰管支架不会增加内镜逆行胰胆管造影术后胰腺炎或其他并发症的发生率。内镜医师在进行预防性胰管操作时可考虑去除胰管侧的凸缘。