文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

内镜逆行胰胆管造影术中改良胰管支架引流治疗胆总管结石的疗效

Efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

作者信息

Qian Li-Jia, Xu Chen, Wang Jian-Rong, Quan Jun

机构信息

Department of Digestive Internal, Taizhou Fourth People's Hospital, Taizhou 225300, Jiangsu Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Apr 27;17(4):101295. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.101295.


DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v17.i4.101295
PMID:40291877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12019049/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Common bile duct stones pose a high risk of recurrence or disease progression if not promptly treated. However, there is still no optimal treatment approach. AIM: To investigate the clinical efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for treating common bile duct stones. METHODS: This retrospective study included 175 patients with common bile duct stones treated at Taizhou Fourth People's Hospital between January 1, 2021, and November 30, 2023. The patients were divided into three groups-the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group (59 cases), the nasobiliary drainage group (58 cases), and the standard biliary drainage group (58 cases). Preoperative general clinical data, laboratory indicators, and the visual analog scale (VAS) at two time points (24 hours before and after surgery) were compared, along with postoperative complications across the three groups. RESULTS: Serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyltransferase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, C-reactive protein, and amylase were significantly lower in the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group and the standard biliary drainage group than those in the nasobiliary drainage group ( < 0.05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed in white blood cells, hemoglobin, or neutrophil levels among the three groups ( > 0.05). The standard biliary drainage group had significantly lower VAS scores [(4.36 ± 1.18) points] than those for the modified pancreatic duct stent drainage group [(4.92 ± 1.68) points] ( = 0.033), and the nasobiliary drainage group [(5.54 ± 1.24) points] ( = 0.017). There were no statistically significant differences in complication rates across the three groups ( > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared to standard biliary drainage and nasobiliary drainage, the modified pancreatic duct stent used during ERCP for patients with bile duct stones significantly reduced hepatocyte injury, improved liver function parameters, alleviated inflammation and pain, enhanced patient comfort, and demonstrated superior safety.

摘要

背景:胆总管结石若不及时治疗,复发或疾病进展风险高。然而,仍没有最佳治疗方法。 目的:探讨改良胰管支架引流术在经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗胆总管结石中的临床疗效。 方法:本回顾性研究纳入了2021年1月1日至2023年11月30日在泰州市第四人民医院接受治疗的175例胆总管结石患者。患者分为三组——改良胰管支架引流组(59例)、鼻胆管引流组(58例)和标准胆管引流组(58例)。比较术前一般临床资料、实验室指标以及两个时间点(手术前后24小时)的视觉模拟评分(VAS),以及三组术后并发症情况。 结果:改良胰管支架引流组和标准胆管引流组的天冬氨酸转氨酶、丙氨酸转氨酶、碱性磷酸酶、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、总胆红素、直接胆红素、C反应蛋白和淀粉酶血清水平显著低于鼻胆管引流组(P<0.05)。然而,三组白细胞、血红蛋白或中性粒细胞水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。标准胆管引流组的VAS评分[(4.36±1.18)分]显著低于改良胰管支架引流组[(4.92±1.68)分](P=0.033)和鼻胆管引流组[(5.54±1.24)分](P=0.017)。三组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。 结论:与标准胆管引流和鼻胆管引流相比,ERCP术中使用改良胰管支架治疗胆管结石患者可显著降低肝细胞损伤,改善肝功能参数,减轻炎症和疼痛,提高患者舒适度,且安全性更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/12019049/b23905c86e72/101295-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/12019049/b23905c86e72/101295-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a6c/12019049/b23905c86e72/101295-g001.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Efficacy of modified pancreatic duct stent drainage during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025-4-27

[2]
The efficacy of a novel integrated outside biliary stent and nasobiliary drainage catheter system for acute cholangitis: a single center pilot study.

Clin Endosc. 2023-11

[3]
Feasibility of Biliary Drainage Using a Novel Integrated Biliary Stent and Nasobiliary Drainage Catheter System for Acute Cholangitis.

Cureus. 2023-4-12

[4]
Biliary spontaneous dislodgement spiral stent for patients who underwent mechanical lithotripsy.

World J Gastroenterol. 2020-2-21

[5]
Endoscopic biliary drainage by nasobiliary drain or by stent placement in patients with acute cholangitis.

Endoscopy. 2005-5

[6]
Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure and intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis.

Surg Endosc. 2023-3

[7]
Antegrade biliary stenting versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy--a comparative cohort study.

Hepatogastroenterology. 2006

[8]
A retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of pancreatic duct stent implantation in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis requiring ERCP.

Eur J Med Res. 2023-12-15

[9]
Efficacy of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage for the prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and cholangitis after repeated clearance of common bile duct stones: experience from a Chinese center.

Dig Endosc. 2012-12-20

[10]
Our experiences in 1000 case single-centre endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

J Minim Access Surg. 2023

本文引用的文献

[1]
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) in Pancreatic Surgery: The Surgeon's Point of View.

J Clin Med. 2024-10-18

[2]
Comparison of 1-stage and 2-stage Managements for Common Bile Duct Stones and Gallstones (CBDS): A Retrospective Study.

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2025-3-1

[3]
Risk factors for recurrence of common bile duct stones after surgical treatment and effect of ursodeoxycholic acid intervention.

World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024-1-27

[4]
Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage versus endoscopic biliary stenting for preoperative biliary drainage in patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction: Propensity score-matched multicenter comparative study.

Dig Endosc. 2024-6

[5]
Comparative analysis of laparoscopic choledocholithiasis and ERCP treatment after cholecystectomy.

BMC Surg. 2023-10-6

[6]
Systematic Appraisal of Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Choledocholithiasis.

Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2023-12-1

[7]
Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021.

J Gastroenterol. 2023-9

[8]
Predicting the Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones After ERCP Treatment with Automated Machine Learning Algorithms.

Dig Dis Sci. 2023-7

[9]
Comprehensive review on small common bile duct stones.

World J Gastroenterol. 2023-4-7

[10]
Pancreatic duct stents.

J Dig Dis. 2022-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索