Suppr超能文献

随机对照试验的荟萃分析:运动训练对腹主动脉瘤患者安全性和有效性的影响。

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on safety and efficacy of exercise training in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm.

机构信息

Department of Shizuoka Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Tokoha University, Shizuoka, Japan.

Department of Shizuoka Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Tokoha University, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 Mar;69(3):933-943. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.07.069. Epub 2018 Dec 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Low exercise capacity preoperatively leads to increased postoperative complications, perioperative mortality, length of stay, and inpatient costs among patients going through elective abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. Therefore, exercise training may be extremely important for reducing perioperative adverse events in AAA patients. This paper aimed to perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the safety of exercise training and its effects on exercise capacity in AAA patients.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials published up to December 2017 that compared exercise training vs usual care without exercise training in AAA patients. The primary outcome was safety, specifically the occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events during the study. Secondary outcomes were changes in AAA diameter, inflammation markers, and exercise capacity based on peak oxygen consumption (peak V˙o) and anaerobic threshold (AT).

RESULTS

We identified 341 trials, and after an assessment of relevance, 7 trials with a combined total of 489 participants were analyzed. There were a total of two cardiovascular adverse events during the exercise test and training, and the cardiovascular event rate and its 95% confidence interval (CI) were 0.8% and 0.2% to 3.1%. Exercise training did not tend to increase AAA diameter, and it also tended to decrease high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level in patients with AAA. All studies that evaluated the changes in AAA diameter or high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level involved patients with AAA diameter <55 mm at baseline; there was no study involving participants with AAA diameter ≥55 mm at baseline. Exercise training significantly increased peak V˙o (pooled mean difference, 1.67 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, 0.69-2.65; P < .001) and AT (pooled mean difference, 1.98 mL/kg/min; 95% CI, 0.77-3.19; P < .001) in AAA patients. The result of meta-regression suggested that the effects of exercise training on peak V˙o and AT were not modulated by the exercise duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analyses suggested that exercise training among AAA patients is generally safe, although future research should be carried out to further clarify the safety among patients with large AAAs. Exercise training improved peak V˙o and AT in AAA patients. More data are required to identify the optimal exercise duration for improving exercise capacity in patients with AAA.

摘要

目的

术前运动能力较低会增加择期腹主动脉瘤(AAA)手术患者的术后并发症、围手术期死亡率、住院时间和住院费用。因此,运动训练对于减少 AAA 患者围手术期不良事件可能极其重要。本文旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以评估运动训练的安全性及其对 AAA 患者运动能力的影响。

方法

我们检索了截至 2017 年 12 月发表的比较 AAA 患者运动训练与不进行运动训练的常规护理的随机对照试验。主要结局是安全性,具体为研究期间心血管不良事件的发生情况。次要结局是根据峰值摄氧量(peak V˙o)和无氧阈(AT)评估 AAA 直径、炎症标志物和运动能力的变化。

结果

我们确定了 341 项试验,经过相关性评估,分析了 7 项试验,共 489 名参与者。运动试验和训练期间共有 2 例心血管不良事件,心血管不良事件发生率及其 95%置信区间(CI)为 0.8%和 0.2%至 3.1%。运动训练并未增加 AAA 直径,而且倾向于降低 AAA 患者的高敏 C 反应蛋白水平。所有评估 AAA 直径或高敏 C 反应蛋白水平变化的研究均涉及基线时 AAA 直径<55mm 的患者;没有涉及基线时 AAA 直径≥55mm 的参与者的研究。运动训练显著增加了 peak V˙o(合并平均差异,1.67mL/kg/min;95%CI,0.69-2.65;P<.001)和 AAA 患者的 AT(合并平均差异,1.98mL/kg/min;95%CI,0.77-3.19;P<.001)。荟萃回归分析的结果表明,运动训练对 peak V˙o 和 AT 的影响不受运动时间的调节。

结论

我们的分析表明,AAA 患者的运动训练通常是安全的,尽管未来的研究应该进一步阐明大型 AAA 患者的安全性。运动训练提高了 AAA 患者的 peak V˙o 和 AT。需要更多的数据来确定改善 AAA 患者运动能力的最佳运动时间。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验