Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.11.001. Epub 2018 Nov 24.
This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of six different biomarkers in patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) and to explore whether a multi-biomarker approach can contribute to a better risk stratification.
In this prospective study, patients with PH were included at the day of the diagnostic right heart catheterization between May 2012 and October 2016. Venous blood sampling included; NT-proBNP, high sensitive troponin-T, high sensitive CRP, galectin-3, red blood cell distribution width and eGFR. Associations between biomarker levels and the primary endpoint (death or lung transplantation) and secondary endpoint (death, lung transplantation or heart failure) were assessed with Cox regression, adjusted for age and sex. Additionally, adjustment for the REVEAL risk score was performed.
In total, 106 patients were included (median age 58.7 [IQR 47.0-69.2] years, 64% women, 51% pulmonary arterial hypertension). After a median follow-up duration of 23.9 [IQR 15.1-40.0] months, respectively 29 and 37 patients reached the primary and secondary endpoint. All six biomarkers, except eGFR, were significantly associated with the endpoints. A multi-biomarker approach including the number of elevated biomarkers per patient, demonstrated that patients were at higher risk of adverse events as more biomarker levels were elevated (HR for each extra elevated biomarker; 1.33, 95% CI 1.07-1.64, P = .01). However, a single as well as a combination of multiple biomarkers, did not yield prognostic value independent of the REVEAL risk score.
Various biomarkers are associated with the event-free survival in adults with PH. However, risk stratification exclusively based on single or a combination of biomarkers seems not superior to existing risk scores.
本研究旨在探讨六种不同生物标志物在肺动脉高压(PH)患者中的预后价值,并探讨多生物标志物方法是否有助于更好地进行风险分层。
在这项前瞻性研究中,于 2012 年 5 月至 2016 年 10 月期间在诊断性右心导管检查当天纳入 PH 患者。静脉血样采集包括:NT-proBNP、高敏肌钙蛋白 T、高敏 C 反应蛋白、半乳糖凝集素-3、红细胞分布宽度和 eGFR。使用 Cox 回归评估生物标志物水平与主要终点(死亡或肺移植)和次要终点(死亡、肺移植或心力衰竭)之间的关联,并根据年龄和性别进行调整。此外,还进行了调整 REVEAL 风险评分的调整。
共纳入 106 例患者(中位年龄 58.7 [IQR 47.0-69.2] 岁,64%为女性,51%为肺动脉高压)。中位随访时间为 23.9 [IQR 15.1-40.0] 个月后,分别有 29 例和 37 例患者达到主要和次要终点。除 eGFR 外,所有 6 种生物标志物均与终点显著相关。包括每个患者升高的生物标志物数量在内的多生物标志物方法表明,随着升高的生物标志物数量增加,患者发生不良事件的风险更高(每增加一个升高的生物标志物的 HR;1.33,95%CI 1.07-1.64,P=0.01)。然而,单个以及多个生物标志物的组合并未产生独立于 REVEAL 风险评分的预后价值。
各种生物标志物与 PH 成人的无事件生存相关。然而,仅基于单个或多个生物标志物的风险分层似乎并不优于现有风险评分。