• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估国家电子健康架构(NEHA)的问卷设计与有效性:研究方案。

Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess national eHealth architecture (NEHA): a study protocol.

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Global Health and Public Policy, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022885. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022885.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022885
PMID:30580265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6318539/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

eHealth is critically important to build strong health systems, and accelerate the achievement of sustainable development goals, particularly universal health coverage. To support and strengthen the health system, the eHealth architecture needs to be formulated and established prior to the implementation and development of any national eHealth applications and services. The aim of this study is to design and validate a standard questionnaire to assess the current status of national eHealth architecture (NEHA) components.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will use a mixed-methods design consisting of four phases: (1) item generation through review of evidences and experts' opinions, (2) face and content validity of the questionnaire, (3) determination of a range of possible scenarios for each item included in the questionnaire and (4) evaluation of reliability. This questionnaire is expected to generate critical and important information about the status of NEHA components that will be useful for monitoring, formulating, developing, implementing and evaluating NEHA. Our paper will contribute, we envisage, to establishment of a socio-technical basis on which governments and other relevant sectors can compare the policy interventions that boost the availability and utilisation of eHealth services within their settings.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The Ethics Committee for Research at the Tehran University of Medical Sciences approved the study protocol. We will obtain informed consent from each participant and collect data anonymously to maintain confidentiality. The translation of the findings into future policy planning will include the production of a series of peer-reviewed articles, presentation of the findings at relevant eHealth conferences and preparation of policy reports to the international organisations aiming to strengthen national capacity for better-informed eHealth architecture.

摘要

简介

电子健康对于构建强大的卫生系统和加速实现可持续发展目标(尤其是全民健康覆盖)至关重要。为了支持和加强卫生系统,需要在实施和开发任何国家电子健康应用和服务之前制定和建立电子健康架构。本研究旨在设计和验证一份标准问卷,以评估国家电子健康架构(NEHA)组件的现状。

方法与分析

本研究将采用混合方法设计,包括四个阶段:(1)通过审查证据和专家意见生成项目;(2)问卷的表面效度和内容效度;(3)确定问卷中包含的每个项目的可能情况范围;(4)评估可靠性。该问卷有望生成有关 NEHA 组件现状的关键和重要信息,这将有助于监测、制定、开发、实施和评估 NEHA。我们预计,我们的论文将有助于建立一个社会技术基础,各国政府和其他相关部门可以在此基础上比较促进其环境中电子健康服务可用性和利用的政策干预措施。

伦理与传播

德黑兰医科大学研究伦理委员会批准了该研究方案。我们将从每位参与者那里获得知情同意,并匿名收集数据以保护隐私。将研究结果转化为未来的政策规划将包括一系列同行评议文章的发表、在相关电子健康会议上展示研究结果以及为旨在加强国家能力以实现更好的电子健康架构的国际组织编写政策报告。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1570/6318539/d1381211b5e7/bmjopen-2018-022885f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1570/6318539/cf0c57851602/bmjopen-2018-022885f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1570/6318539/d1381211b5e7/bmjopen-2018-022885f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1570/6318539/cf0c57851602/bmjopen-2018-022885f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1570/6318539/d1381211b5e7/bmjopen-2018-022885f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Design and validity of a questionnaire to assess national eHealth architecture (NEHA): a study protocol.评估国家电子健康架构(NEHA)的问卷设计与有效性:研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 22;8(12):e022885. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022885.
2
Sixteen years of eHealth experiences in Iran: a qualitative content analysis of national policies.十六年来伊朗的电子健康经验:国家政策的定性内容分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00795-x.
3
Impact of using eHealth tools to extend health services to rural areas of Nigeria: protocol for a mixed-method, non-randomised cluster trial.利用电子健康工具将卫生服务拓展至尼日利亚农村地区的影响:一项混合方法、非随机对照群组试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 18;8(10):e022174. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022174.
4
Development and Progression in Danish eHealth Policies: Towards Evidence-Based Policy Making.丹麦电子健康政策的发展与进程:迈向循证决策
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019 Aug 21;264:1075-1079. doi: 10.3233/SHTI190390.
5
A new method for assessing content validity in model-based creation and iteration of eHealth interventions.一种在基于模型的电子健康干预措施创建与迭代中评估内容效度的新方法。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 15;17(4):e95. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3811.
6
What is eHealth (5): a research agenda for eHealth through stakeholder consultation and policy context review.什么是电子健康(5):通过利益相关者协商和政策背景审查制定电子健康研究议程。
J Med Internet Res. 2005 Nov 10;7(5):e54. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.5.e54.
7
eHealth in Saudi Arabia: Current Trends, Challenges and Recommendations.沙特阿拉伯的电子健康:当前趋势、挑战与建议。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;213:233-6.
8
Towards National eHealth Implementation--a comparative study on WHO/ITU National eHealth Strategy Toolkit in Iran.迈向国家电子健康实施——关于伊朗世卫组织/国际电联国家电子健康战略工具包的比较研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2014;205:246-50.
9
Review on the state of telemedicine and eHealth in Iceland.冰岛远程医疗与电子健康状况综述。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2004 Dec;63(4):349-55. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v63i4.17752.
10
Protocol for a systematic review and qualitative synthesis of information quality frameworks in eHealth.电子健康信息质量框架的系统评价和定性综合研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 5;9(3):e024722. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024722.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers to Telemedicine Establishment in Iran: A Systematic Review.伊朗远程医疗建立的障碍:一项系统综述。
Iran J Public Health. 2025 Apr;54(4):739-750. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v54i4.18412.
2
Development of a Quality Management Model and Self-assessment Questionnaire for Hybrid Health Care: Concept Mapping Study.混合医疗质量管理模型与自我评估问卷的开发:概念映射研究
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Jul 7;6(7):e38683. doi: 10.2196/38683.
3
Pharmaceutical subsidy policy in Iran: a qualitative stakeholder analysis.伊朗的药品补贴政策:利益相关者定性分析。

本文引用的文献

1
Health information technology in ambulatory care in a developing country.发展中国家门诊医疗中的健康信息技术
Electron Physician. 2018 Feb 25;10(2):6319-6326. doi: 10.19082/6319. eCollection 2018 Feb.
2
A systematic scoping review of the domains and innovations in secondary uses of digitised health-related data.对数字化健康相关数据二次利用的领域和创新进行的系统综述。
J Innov Health Inform. 2016 Nov 10;23(3):611-619. doi: 10.14236/jhi.v23i3.841.
3
Readiness of healthcare providers for eHealth: the case from primary healthcare centers in Lebanon.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00762-6.
4
Sixteen years of eHealth experiences in Iran: a qualitative content analysis of national policies.十六年来伊朗的电子健康经验:国家政策的定性内容分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 11;19(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00795-x.
5
Study protocol: A cross-sectional study on instrumental support for transitional care among older adults with chronic diseases.研究方案:一项关于慢性病老年患者过渡性护理工具性支持的横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2021 Jul;8(4):1990-1997. doi: 10.1002/nop2.837. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
6
Validation of an e-health readiness assessment framework for developing countries.电子健康准备度评估框架在发展中国家的验证。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Jun 23;20(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05448-3.
医疗服务提供者对电子健康的准备情况:黎巴嫩初级医疗保健中心的案例
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Nov 10;16(1):644. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1896-2.
4
A scoping review of Australian allied health research in ehealth.澳大利亚电子健康领域联合健康研究的范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 4;16(1):543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1791-x.
5
Development and Validation of Attitude toward Gestational Surrogacy Scale in Iranian Infertile Couples.伊朗不孕夫妇对代孕态度量表的编制与验证
Int J Fertil Steril. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(1):113-9. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2016.4776. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
6
eHealth integration and interoperability issues: towards a solution through enterprise architecture.电子健康集成和互操作性问题:通过企业架构寻找解决方案。
Health Inf Sci Syst. 2015 May 13;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s13755-015-0009-7. eCollection 2015.
7
Trends in the use of the Internet for health purposes in Poland.波兰利用互联网实现健康目的的趋势。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Feb 27;15:194. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1473-3.
8
Addressing healthy aging populations in developing countries: unlocking the opportunity of eHealth and mHealth.应对发展中国家的健康老龄化人口:释放电子健康和移动健康的机遇。
Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2014 Dec 31;11(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12982-014-0021-4. eCollection 2014.
9
The clinical adoption meta-model: a temporal meta-model describing the clinical adoption of health information systems.临床采用元模型:一个描述健康信息系统临床采用的时间元模型。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 May 29;14:43. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-43.
10
In eHealth in India today, the nature of work, the challenges and the finances: an interview-based study.在当今印度的电子健康领域,工作性质、挑战和资金:一项基于访谈的研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Jan 6;14:1. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-1.