Diagnostic Yield of Intellectual Disability Gene Panels.

BACKGROUND

Recent technological advances have improved the understanding and identification of the genetic basis of intellectual disability (ID) and global developmental delay (GDD). Next-generation sequencing panels of ID genes are now available for clinical testing; however, their overall yield in clinical practice has not yet been investigated.

AIM

We determined the diagnostic yield of ID gene panels in a clinical setting and explored whether any clinical features are associated with an increased diagnostic yield.

METHODS

We performed a systematic retrospective chart review of all patients with ID/GDD who underwent an ID gene panel between April 2014 and July 2017 at our institution. Chi-square analysis assessed whether any specific clinical features were significantly associated with a positive diagnostic yield.

RESULTS

Forty-eight subjects (18 females, 30 males; median age: 7.5 years) were included. Consanguinity was present in 17%, autism in 38%, seizures in 42%, nonspecific dysmorphic features in 67%, and abnormalities on neurological examination in 56%; furthermore, 29% of the cohort was nonverbal and 4% was nonambulatory. Four different gene panels were used. The diagnostic yield was 21% (10/48) overall, and 38% with the more recent trio-based panel. Eight of 10 patients had de novo pathogenic dominant mutations, one had an inherited pathogenic autosomal dominant mutation, and one had compound heterozygous pathogenic recessive mutations. No clinical feature was significantly associated with an increased diagnostic yield.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that ID gene panels have a high yield and are a valuable diagnostic tool in the evaluation of children with ID/GDD.