Fazio Carolina, Covre Alessia, Cutaia Ornella, Lofiego Maria Fortunata, Tunici Patrizia, Chiarucci Carla, Cannito Sara, Giacobini Gianluca, Lowder James N, Ferraldeschi Roberta, Taverna Pietro, Di Giacomo Anna Maria, Coral Sandra, Maio Michele
Department of Oncology, Center for Immuno-Oncology, Medical Oncology and Immunotherapy, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, United States.
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Dec 7;9:1443. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.01443. eCollection 2018.
DNA hypomethylating agents (DHAs) play a well-acknowledged role in potentiating the immunogenicity and the immune recognition of neoplastic cells. This immunomodulatory activity of DHAs is linked to their ability to induce or to up-regulate on neoplastic cells the expression of a variety of immune molecules that play a crucial role in host-tumor immune interactions. To further investigate the clinical potential of diverse epigenetic compounds when combined with immunotherapeutic strategies, we have now compared the tumor immunomodulatory properties of the first generation DHAs, azacytidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC) and of the next generation DHA, guadecitabine. To this end, human melanoma and hematological cancer cells were treated with 1 μM guadecitabine, DAC or AZA and then studied by molecular and flow cytometry analyses for changes in their baseline expression of selected immune molecules involved in different mechanism(s) of immune recognition. Results demonstrated a stronger DNA hypomethylating activity of guadecitabine and DAC, compared to AZA that associated with stronger immunomodulatory activities. Indeed, the mRNA expression of cancer testis antigens, immune-checkpoint blocking molecules, immunostimulatory cytokines, involved in NK and T cell signaling and recruiting, and of genes involved in interferon pathway was higher after guadecitabine and DAC compared to AZA treatment. Moreover, a stronger up-regulation of the constitutive expression of HLA class I antigens and of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 was observed with guadecitabine and DAC compared to AZA. Guadecitabine and DAC seem to represent the optimal combination partners to improve the therapeutic efficacy of immunotherapeutic agents in combination/sequencing clinical studies.
DNA低甲基化剂(DHA)在增强肿瘤细胞的免疫原性和免疫识别方面发挥着公认的作用。DHA的这种免疫调节活性与其诱导或上调肿瘤细胞上多种免疫分子表达的能力有关,这些免疫分子在宿主-肿瘤免疫相互作用中起着关键作用。为了进一步研究不同表观遗传化合物与免疫治疗策略联合使用时的临床潜力,我们现在比较了第一代DHA(阿扎胞苷(AZA)和地西他滨(DAC))以及下一代DHA(胍地西他滨)的肿瘤免疫调节特性。为此,用人黑色素瘤和血液癌细胞分别用1μM胍地西他滨、DAC或AZA处理,然后通过分子和流式细胞术分析研究参与不同免疫识别机制的选定免疫分子的基线表达变化。结果表明,与AZA相比,胍地西他滨和DAC具有更强的DNA低甲基化活性,且与更强的免疫调节活性相关。事实上,与AZA处理相比,胍地西他滨和DAC处理后,参与NK和T细胞信号传导及募集的癌胚抗原、免疫检查点阻断分子、免疫刺激细胞因子以及参与干扰素途径的基因的mRNA表达更高。此外,与AZA相比,胍地西他滨和DAC处理后观察到HLA I类抗原和细胞间粘附分子-1的组成性表达上调更强。在联合/序贯临床研究中,胍地西他滨和DAC似乎是提高免疫治疗药物治疗效果的最佳联合伙伴。