Suppr超能文献

[疑似尿路感染的老年住院发热患者:诊断与治疗方法]

[ELDERLY HOSPITALIZED FEBRILE PATIENTS WITH A SUSPECTED URINARY TRACT INFECTION: DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC APPROACH].

作者信息

Shimoni Zvi, Hermush Vered, Froom Paul

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine B, Laniado Hospital, Netanya.

Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa.

出版信息

Harefuah. 2018 Dec;157(12):802-806.

Abstract

Since the urinary tract is thought to be one of the common sources of fever in hospitalized geriatric patients, urine analysis and urine cultures are routinely ordered in patients with and without urinary tract symptoms. The widespread lack of understanding of the uncertainties in the diagnosis and treatment of a symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) leads to unnecessary laboratory testing, and inappropriate antibiotic therapy. We present evidence for the following proposal that on the one hand will limit urine cultures and unnecessary antibiotic therapy without compromising patient safety and on the other hand will ensure proper antibiotic therapy. (1) Patients with extra-urinary sources for their fever should not have a urinalysis or urine culture. (2) In-and-out urinary catheterization procedures to obtain a sample should be limited (3) Patients without a positive dipstick test result do not need a urine culture in some settings. (4) A negative microscopic urinalysis after a positive dipstick test does not rule out a symptomatic UTI. (5) Febrile elderly patients without evidence of end organ damage can be followed-up carefully without antibiotic therapy. (6) Patients with septic shock require immediate antibiotic treatment with a carbapenem. It is unclear however, what to do with patients who have evidence of end organ damage variously defined. Whether these patients need immediate antibiotic treatment with or without coverage of ESBL-producing bacteria to decrease the risk for in-hospital mortality is an important question that requires randomized controlled studies.

摘要

由于尿路被认为是老年住院患者发热的常见来源之一,因此无论有无尿路症状,都会对患者常规进行尿液分析和尿培养。对有症状性尿路感染(UTI)诊断和治疗的不确定性普遍缺乏认识,导致了不必要的实验室检查和不恰当的抗生素治疗。我们提出以下建议的证据,一方面将限制尿培养和不必要的抗生素治疗,同时不影响患者安全,另一方面将确保适当的抗生素治疗。(1) 发热源于尿路外因素的患者不应进行尿液分析或尿培养。(2) 应限制通过进出式导尿术获取样本。(3) 在某些情况下,试纸检测结果为阴性的患者不需要进行尿培养。(4) 试纸检测呈阳性后显微镜下尿液分析结果为阴性并不能排除有症状性UTI。(5) 没有终末器官损伤证据的发热老年患者可以在不使用抗生素治疗的情况下进行密切随访。(6) 感染性休克患者需要立即使用碳青霉烯类抗生素治疗。然而,对于有不同定义的终末器官损伤证据的患者该如何处理尚不清楚。这些患者是否需要立即进行抗生素治疗,无论是否覆盖产ESBL细菌以降低住院死亡率,这是一个需要随机对照研究的重要问题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验