Shimoni Zvi, Avdiaev Ruslan, Froom Paul
Internal Medicine Department B, Laniado Hospital, Netanya, Israel; Technion Ruth and Bruce Rappaport School of Medicine, Haifa, Israel.
Internal Medicine Department B, Laniado Hospital, Netanya, Israel.
Am J Med Sci. 2017 Jan;353(1):17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2016.11.001. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
Urine cultures are commonly ordered in geriatric patients presenting with fever in the emergency department, but it is unclear if indiscriminate urine culture testing is warranted.
We selected 708 consecutive geriatric patients with a chief complaint of fever to determine the clinical usage (changes in antibiotic therapy according to culture results) and the costs of culturing the urine that included the need for catheterization to obtain a sample for culture and complications from catheterization. We divided the patients into those with and without an extraurinary tract source for fever on admission.
Urine cultures were performed in 74.9% (233/312) of the patients with a source for the fever outside the urinary tract and required urinary catheterization to obtain a sample in 36.8% (95/233) of those patients. Cultures were positive for bacteria 29.6% of the time (69/233), but did not result in the change of antibiotic treatment in any of the patients. Urine cultures were performed in 92.6% (326/352) of the patients without an extraurinary tract source for the fever, required catheterization in 49.7% (162/326) of the patients and 58.3% (190/326) of the cultures were positive for bacteria. Urine culture sensitivities changed antibiotic therapy in 24.2% (46/190) of the patients. There were no patients in either group with complications from urinary catheterization, but indwelling catheter rates increased inappropriately in both the groups.
We conclude that urine culture testing is unnecessary in hospitalized geriatric patients who on admission have an extraurinary tract source for their fever, but it has clinical usage when the source for the fever on admission is unclear.
在急诊科出现发热症状的老年患者中,通常会进行尿培养检查,但目前尚不清楚是否有必要进行无差别尿培养检测。
我们选取了708例以发热为主诉的连续老年患者,以确定尿培养的临床应用情况(根据培养结果调整抗生素治疗方案)以及尿培养的成本,其中包括为获取培养样本而进行导尿的必要性及导尿相关并发症。我们将患者分为入院时存在尿路外发热源和不存在尿路外发热源两组。
尿路外有发热源的患者中,74.9%(233/312)进行了尿培养,其中36.8%(95/233)的患者需要通过导尿获取样本。培养结果显示细菌阳性率为29.6%(69/233),但所有患者的抗生素治疗方案均未因培养结果而改变。无尿路外发热源的患者中,92.6%(326/352)进行了尿培养,49.7%(162/326)的患者需要导尿,58.3%(190/326)的培养结果显示细菌阳性。尿培养药敏结果使24.2%(46/190)的患者的抗生素治疗方案发生了改变。两组均无患者出现导尿相关并发症,但两组患者的留置导尿管使用率均出现了不合理增加。
我们得出结论,对于入院时存在尿路外发热源的老年住院患者,尿培养检查是不必要的,但当入院时发热源不明时,尿培养检查具有临床应用价值。