González-López G, Descalzo-Gallego M Á, Arias-Santiago S, Molina-Leyva A, Gilaberte Y, Fernández-Crehuet P, Husein-El Ahmed H, Viera-Ramírez A, Fernández-Peñas P, Taberner R, García-Doval I, Buendía-Eisman A
Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, España.
Unidad de Investigación, Fundación Piel Sana AEDV, Madrid, España.
Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2019 Mar;110(2):146-152. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2018.09.004. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
Understanding the origin and referral routes of patients seen in teledermatology and in-person dermatology consultations in Spain is of interest from the perspective of health care management. The objective of this study was to describe the referral routes and the frequency and characteristics of teledermatology consultations in Spain.
We performed a descriptive cross-sectional study of data collected over 6 days from the DIADERM study sample, which included the outpatients diagnosed by 80 Spanish dermatologists, selected by means of stratified random sampling. We studied the source and destination of patients based on funding, type of consultation, and age of the patients. We reported the frequency of teledermatology consultations, their origin and destination, type of funding, age of the patients, and most common diagnoses, and compared them with the same characteristics for in-person consultations.
In private consultations, most patients were direct clients, whereas the most frequent source in public consultations was primary care and the dermatologist. Sixty-six percent of patients were referred to dermatology and 27% were discharged. No differences in these percentages were found between public and private consultations. The ratio of follow-up to initial visits was 0.8 for public consultations and 0.2 for private consultations. Teledermatology accounts for 1% of consultations. Eighty percent of these come from primary care and 17% are direct visits. Thirty-three percent of these visits are referred to primary care - a greater proportion than in in-person consultations. Galicia, Andalusia, and Catalonia are the regions with the highest percentage of consultations.
The results suggest that dermatologists in Spain have a considerable ability to resolve cases. Teledermatology accounts for a small percentage of consultations and access to these consultations is direct in a large percentage of cases.
从医疗管理的角度来看,了解西班牙远程皮肤病学和面对面皮肤病学会诊中患者的来源及转诊途径很有意义。本研究的目的是描述西班牙远程皮肤病学会诊的转诊途径、频率及特征。
我们对从DIADERM研究样本中6天内收集的数据进行了描述性横断面研究,该样本包括通过分层随机抽样选取的80名西班牙皮肤科医生诊断的门诊患者。我们根据资金来源、会诊类型和患者年龄研究了患者的来源和去向。我们报告了远程皮肤病学会诊的频率、来源和去向、资金类型、患者年龄以及最常见的诊断,并将其与面对面会诊的相同特征进行了比较。
在私人会诊中,大多数患者是直接客户,而在公共会诊中最常见的来源是初级保健机构和皮肤科医生。66%的患者被转诊至皮肤科,27%的患者被出院。在公共会诊和私人会诊之间,这些百分比没有差异。公共会诊的随访与初诊比例为0.8,私人会诊为0.2。远程皮肤病学会诊占会诊总数的1%。其中80%来自初级保健机构,17%是直接就诊。这些就诊中有33%被转诊至初级保健机构——这一比例高于面对面会诊。加利西亚、安达卢西亚和加泰罗尼亚是会诊百分比最高的地区。
结果表明,西班牙的皮肤科医生有相当的能力解决病例。远程皮肤病学会诊占会诊的比例较小,并且在很大比例的病例中,这些会诊的获取是直接的。