RAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.
Department of Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Dermatol. 2016 Aug 1;152(8):905-12. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0938.
Access to specialists such as dermatologists is often limited for Medicaid enrollees. Teledermatology has been promoted as a potential solution; however, its effect on access to care at the population level has rarely been assessed.
To evaluate the effect of teledermatology on the number of Medicaid enrollees who received dermatology care and to describe which patients were most likely to be referred to teledermatology.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Claims data from a large California Medicaid managed care plan that began offering teledermatology as a covered service in April 2012 were analyzed. The plan enrolled 382 801 patients in California's Central Valley, including 108 480 newly enrolled patients who obtained coverage after the implementation of the Affordable Care Act. Rates of dermatology visits by patients affiliated with primary care practices that referred patients to teledermatology and those that did not were compared. Data were collected from April 1, 2012, through December 31, 2014, and assessed from March 1 to October 15, 2015.
The percentage of patients with at least 1 visit to a dermatologist (including in-person and teledermatology visits) and total visits with dermatologists (including in-person and teledermatology visits) per 1000 patients.
Of the 382 801 patients enrolled for at least 1 day from 2012 to 2014, 8614 (2.2%) had 1 or more visits with a dermatologist. Of all patients who visited a dermatologist, 48.5% received care via teledermatology. Among the patients newly enrolled in Medicaid, 75.7% (1474 of 1947) of those who visited a dermatologist received care via teledermatology. Primary care practices that engaged in teledermatology had a 63.8% increase in the fraction of patients visiting a dermatologist (vs 20.5% in other practices; P < .01). Compared with in-person dermatology, teledermatology served more patients younger vs older than 17 years (2600 of 4427 [58.7%] vs 1404 of 4187 [33.5%]), male patients (1849 of 4427 [41.8%] vs 1526 of 4187 [36.4%]), nonwhite patients (2779 of 4188 [66.4%] vs 1844 of 3478 [53.0%]), and individuals without comorbid conditions (1795 of 2464 [72.8%] vs 1978 of 3024 [65.4%]) (P < .001 for all comparisons). Conditions managed across settings varied; teledermatology physicians were more likely to care for viral skin lesions and acne (3405 of 7287 visits [46.7%]), whereas in-person dermatologists were more likely to care for psoriasis and skin neoplasms (10 062 of 27 347 visits [36.8%]).
The offering of teledermatology appeared to improve access to dermatology care among Medicaid enrollees and played an especially important role for the newly enrolled.
对于医疗补助计划的参保者来说,获得皮肤科专家的途径往往是有限的。远程皮肤病学被认为是一种潜在的解决方案;然而,它对人群层面的护理获得情况的影响很少被评估。
评估远程皮肤病学对接受皮肤病护理的医疗补助参保者人数的影响,并描述哪些患者最有可能被转诊至远程皮肤病学。
设计、设置和参与者:分析了来自加利福尼亚州一个大型医疗补助管理式医疗计划的索赔数据,该计划于 2012 年 4 月开始提供远程皮肤病学作为一项覆盖服务。该计划在加利福尼亚州的中央山谷为 382810 名患者提供服务,其中包括 108480 名在平价医疗法案实施后获得保险的新参保者。比较了与转介患者至远程皮肤病学的初级保健实践附属患者和未转介患者的皮肤科就诊率。数据收集自 2012 年 4 月 1 日至 2014 年 12 月 31 日,并于 2015 年 3 月 1 日至 10 月 15 日进行评估。
每 1000 名患者中至少有 1 次皮肤科就诊(包括现场和远程皮肤病学就诊)的患者百分比和每 1000 名患者中与皮肤科医生就诊的总次数(包括现场和远程皮肤病学就诊)。
在 2012 年至 2014 年期间至少有 1 天参加保险的 382810 名患者中,有 8614 名(2.2%)患者有 1 次或多次皮肤科就诊。所有就诊皮肤科的患者中,有 48.5%的人接受了远程皮肤病学治疗。在新参加医疗补助计划的患者中,有 75.7%(1474 名患者中有 1947 名)的患者在就诊皮肤科时接受了远程皮肤病学治疗。进行远程皮肤病学的初级保健实践的患者中,就诊皮肤科的患者比例增加了 63.8%(与其他实践中的 20.5%相比;P < .01)。与现场皮肤病学相比,远程皮肤病学服务了更多的年轻患者(17 岁以下的患者 2600 名中有 4427 名[58.7%],而 17 岁以上的患者 1404 名中有 4187 名[33.5%])、男性患者(4427 名中有 1849 名[41.8%],而 4187 名中有 1526 名[36.4%])、非白种人患者(4188 名中有 2779 名[66.4%],而 3478 名中有 1844 名[53.0%])和无合并症的患者(2464 名中有 1795 名[72.8%],而 3024 名中有 1978 名[65.4%])(所有比较均 < .001)。不同就诊环境下管理的疾病情况有所不同;远程皮肤病学医生更有可能治疗病毒性皮肤病变和痤疮(7287 次就诊中有 3405 次[46.7%]),而现场皮肤科医生更有可能治疗银屑病和皮肤肿瘤(27347 次就诊中有 10062 次[36.8%])。
远程皮肤病学的提供似乎改善了医疗补助参保者获得皮肤病护理的机会,对新参保者尤其重要。