Department of Neurology, Baystate Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, 759 Chestnut St, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA; Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science and Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, Springfield, MA, USA.
Department of Medicine, Baystate Medical Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School-Baystate, 759 Chestnut St, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA.
Sleep Med. 2020 Mar;67:249-255. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
Apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), especially without arousal criteria, does not adequately risk stratify patients with mild obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We describe and test scoring reliability of an event, Flow Limitation/Obstruction With recovery breath (FLOW), representing obstructive airflow disruptions using only pressure transducer and snore signals available without electroencephalography.
The following process was used (i) Development of FLOW event definition, (ii) Training period and definition refinement, and (iii) Reliability testing on 10 100-epoch polysomnography (PSG) samples and two 100-sample tests. Twenty full-night in-laboratory baseline PSGs in OSA patients with AHI with ≥4% desaturations <15 were rescored for FLOW events, traditional hypopneas with desaturations, respiratory-related arousal (RRA) events (hypopneas with arousals and respiratory-effort related arousals) and non-respiratory arousals (NRA).
Scoring of FLOW events in 100-epoch samples had good reliability with intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.91. The overall kappa for presence of events on two sets of 100 sample events was 0.84 and 0.87 demonstrating good agreement. Moreover, 80% of RRA and 8% of NRA were concurrent with FLOW events. Furthermore, 56% of FLOW events were independent of RRA events. FLOW stratifies patients in traditional AHI categories with 50%/8% of AHI with ≥3% desaturations (AHI3) <5 and 12%/63% of AHI3 >5 in lowest/highest tertiles of AHI3 plus FLOW index.
Scoring of FLOW after training is reliable. FLOW scores a high proportion of RRA and many currently unrepresented obstructive airflow disruptions. FLOW allows for stratification within the current normal-mild OSA category, which may better identify patients who will benefit from treatment.
呼吸暂停/低通气指数(AHI),尤其是没有觉醒标准,不能充分对轻度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)患者进行风险分层。我们描述并测试了仅使用压力传感器和鼾声信号(无需脑电图)记录的代表阻塞性气流中断的事件,即气流受限/阻塞伴恢复呼吸(FLOW)的评分可靠性。
使用以下过程:(i)开发 FLOW 事件定义,(ii)训练期和定义细化,以及(iii)在 10 个 100 个epoch 多导睡眠图(PSG)样本和两个 100 个样本测试中的可靠性测试。对 20 例在实验室中进行的、患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停且 AHI 大于等于 4%、但无 15 次以下的血氧饱和度降低的患者进行全夜基线 PSG 重新评分,以评估 FLOW 事件、伴有血氧饱和度降低的传统低通气、呼吸相关觉醒(RRA)事件(伴有觉醒的低通气和呼吸努力相关觉醒)和非呼吸觉醒(NRA)。
在 100 个 epoch 样本中对 FLOW 事件的评分具有良好的可靠性,组内相关系数(ICC)为 0.91。两套 100 个样本事件的总体 Kappa 值为 0.84 和 0.87,表明具有良好的一致性。此外,80%的 RRA 和 8%的 NRA 与 FLOW 事件同时发生。此外,56%的 FLOW 事件与 RRA 事件无关。此外,FLOW 可对传统 AHI 类别中的患者进行分层,在 AHI3 最低/最高三分位中,50%/8%的 AHI3 伴有≥3%的血氧饱和度降低(AHI3)<5,而 12%/63%的 AHI3 伴有≥3%的血氧饱和度降低(AHI3)>5。
经过训练后对 FLOW 进行评分是可靠的。FLOW 记录了很大比例的 RRA 和许多目前未被记录的阻塞性气流中断。FLOW 可在当前正常轻度 OSA 类别内进行分层,这可能更好地识别出将从治疗中获益的患者。