Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Division of Acute Care/Health Systems, Yale School of Nursing, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Thorax. 2018 May;73(5):472-480. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210431. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a heterogeneous disorder, and improved understanding of physiologic phenotypes and their clinical implications is needed. We aimed to determine whether routine polysomnographic data can be used to identify OSA phenotypes (clusters) and to assess the associations between the phenotypes and cardiovascular outcomes.
Cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses of a multisite, observational US Veteran (n=1247) cohort were performed. Principal components-based clustering was used to identify polysomnographic features in OSA's four pathophysiological domains (sleep architecture disturbance, autonomic dysregulation, breathing disturbance and hypoxia). Using these features, OSA phenotypes were identified by cluster analysis (K-means). Cox survival analysis was used to evaluate longitudinal relationships between clusters and the combined outcome of incident transient ischaemic attack, stroke, acute coronary syndrome or death.
Seven patient clusters were identified based on distinguishing polysomnographic features: 'mild', 'periodic limb movements of sleep (PLMS)', 'NREM and arousal', 'REM and hypoxia', 'hypopnoea and hypoxia', 'arousal and poor sleep' and 'combined severe'. In adjusted analyses, the risk (compared with 'mild') of the combined outcome (HR (95% CI)) was significantly increased for 'PLMS', (2.02 (1.32 to 3.08)), 'hypopnoea and hypoxia' (1.74 (1.02 to 2.99)) and 'combined severe' (1.69 (1.09 to 2.62)). Conventional apnoea-hypopnoea index (AHI) severity categories of moderate (15≤AHI<30) and severe (AHI ≥30), compared with mild/none category (AHI <15), were not associated with increased risk.
Among patients referred for OSA evaluation, routine polysomnographic data can identify physiological phenotypes that capture risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes otherwise missed by conventional OSA severity classification.
阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种异质性疾病,需要更好地了解生理表型及其临床意义。我们旨在确定常规多导睡眠图数据是否可用于识别 OSA 表型(聚类),并评估表型与心血管结局之间的关联。
对美国退伍军人多中心观察队列(n=1247)进行了横断面和纵向分析。基于主成分的聚类分析用于确定 OSA 四个病理生理域(睡眠结构紊乱、自主神经调节障碍、呼吸紊乱和缺氧)的多导睡眠图特征。使用这些特征,通过聚类分析(K 均值)确定 OSA 表型。Cox 生存分析用于评估聚类与短暂性脑缺血发作、卒中等事件后联合结局之间的纵向关系。
基于区分多导睡眠图特征,确定了 7 种患者聚类:“轻度”、“睡眠周期性肢体运动(PLMS)”、“非快速眼动和觉醒”、“快速眼动和缺氧”、“低通气和缺氧”、“觉醒和睡眠不佳”和“综合严重”。在调整分析中,与“轻度”相比,“PLMS”(2.02(1.32 至 3.08))、“低通气和缺氧”(1.74(1.02 至 2.99))和“综合严重”(1.69(1.09 至 2.62))的联合结局风险(HR(95%CI))显著增加。与轻度/无(AHI<15)相比,中度(15≤AHI<30)和重度(AHI≥30)的传统呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)严重程度类别与增加的风险无关。
在接受 OSA 评估的患者中,常规多导睡眠图数据可以识别出生理表型,这些表型可以捕捉到常规 OSA 严重程度分类可能遗漏的不良心血管结局风险。