Suppr超能文献

甲状腺癌中全内镜甲状腺切除术与传统开放性甲状腺切除术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Total endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy in thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Chen Cong, Huang Shumin, Huang Aihua, Jia Yunlu, Wang Ji, Mao Misha, Zhou Jichun, Wang Linbo

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China,

Biomedical Research Center and Key Laboratory of Biotherapy of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China,

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018 Dec 5;14:2349-2361. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S183612. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the considerable experience gained thus far using endoscopic technologies, the role of total endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) for papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety and effectiveness of total ET compared with conventional open thyroidectomy (OT) in PTC.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library electronic databases up to March 2018. The quality of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Review Manager software version 5.3 was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 2,672 patients were ultimately included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. ET was associated with longer operative time (<0.00001), drainage time (<0.00001) and hospital stay (=0.03), higher transient recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy rate (=0.004) and a greater amount of drainage fluid (<0.0001) compared with OT. Furthermore, no significant differences were detected between ET and OT in terms of retrieved lymph nodes (=0.17), blood loss (=0.22), transient hypocalcemia (=0.84), permanent hypocalcemia (=0.58), permanent RLN palsy (=0.14), hematoma or bleeding (=0.15) and seroma (=0.54). In addition, the rates of tumor recurrence were comparable (=0.18), whereas the proportions of stimulated thyroglobulin levels <1 ng/mL measured after completion of thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine therapy were less (=0.02) in the ET than in the OT group.

CONCLUSION

ET is not superior to OT in terms of operation and drainage time, amount of drainage fluid, hospital stay or transient RLN palsy, but is comparable to OT in terms of retrieved lymph nodes and permanent complications. Despite the similar tumor recurrence rates between the two approaches, the level of surgical completeness in ET may not be as good as that for OT.

摘要

背景

尽管目前使用内镜技术已积累了相当多的经验,但全内镜甲状腺切除术(ET)在甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)治疗中的作用仍存在争议。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究全内镜甲状腺切除术与传统开放性甲状腺切除术(OT)相比在治疗PTC中的安全性和有效性。

方法

截至2018年3月,使用PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆电子数据库进行了系统检索。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估纳入研究的质量。使用Review Manager软件5.3版进行荟萃分析。

结果

系统评价和荟萃分析最终纳入了12项研究,共2672例患者。与OT相比,ET的手术时间更长(<0.00001)、引流时间更长(<0.00001)、住院时间更长(=0.03)、暂时性喉返神经(RLN)麻痹发生率更高(=0.004)、引流量更多(<0.0001)。此外,ET与OT在清扫淋巴结数量(=0.17)、失血量(=0.22)、暂时性低钙血症(=0.84)、永久性低钙血症(=0.58)、永久性RLN麻痹(=0.14)、血肿或出血(=0.15)以及血清肿(=0.54)方面未检测到显著差异。另外,肿瘤复发率相当(=0.18),而甲状腺切除术后及放射性碘治疗后促甲状腺球蛋白水平<1 ng/mL的比例,ET组低于OT组(=0.02)。

结论

在手术和引流时间、引流量、住院时间或暂时性RLN麻痹方面,ET并不优于OT,但在清扫淋巴结数量和永久性并发症方面与OT相当。尽管两种方法的肿瘤复发率相似,但ET的手术彻底程度可能不如OT。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32df/6287425/2a74a6b0ad0f/tcrm-14-2349Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验