Rehabilitation Engineering and Technology Institute, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China.
Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Assistive Devices, Shanghai 200093, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 21;2018:2898546. doi: 10.1155/2018/2898546. eCollection 2018.
The metabolic energy expenditure (MEE) was the most important assessment standard of intelligent prosthetic knee (IPK). Maximum swing flexion (MSF) angle and gait symmetry (GS) were two control targets representing different developing directions for IPK. However, the few comparisons based on MEE assessment between the MSF and GS limited the development of the IPK design.
The aim of the present work was to find out the MEE difference of amputees using IPK with control targets of MSF and GS and determine which target was more suitable for the control of IPK based on the MEE assessment.
The crossover trial was designed. Six unilateral transfemoral amputees participated in the study. The amputees were assessed when wearing the IPK with different control targets, namely, the maximum swing flexion angle and gait symmetry. The oxygen consumption analysis during walking at different speeds on a treadmill was carried out.
All subjects showed increased oxygen consumption as walking speed increased. However, no statistically significant differences were found in oxygen consumption for different control targets. The ANOVA test showed that the overall effects of the control targets of the prosthetic knee on oxygen consumption were not significant across all walking speeds.
The control targets of MSF and GS showed no significant differences on MEE in above-knee amputees using IPK. From perspective of amputee's metabolic costs, either maximum swing flexion or gait symmetry could be suitable control target for the IPK.
代谢能量消耗(MEE)是智能假肢膝关节(IPK)的最重要评估标准。最大摆动屈曲(MSF)角度和步态对称性(GS)是 IPK 代表不同发展方向的两个控制目标。然而,基于 MEE 评估的 MSF 和 GS 之间的少数比较限制了 IPK 设计的发展。
本研究旨在找出使用 MSF 和 GS 控制目标的假肢患者的 MEE 差异,并根据 MEE 评估确定哪个目标更适合 IPK 的控制。
设计了交叉试验。六名单侧股骨截肢者参加了研究。当穿着具有不同控制目标(即最大摆动屈曲角度和步态对称性)的 IPK 时,对患者进行评估。在跑步机上以不同速度行走时进行耗氧量分析。
所有受试者的耗氧量随着行走速度的增加而增加。然而,不同控制目标的耗氧量没有统计学上的显著差异。方差分析测试表明,在所有行走速度下,假肢膝关节控制目标对耗氧量的总体影响不显著。
在上肢截肢患者使用 IPK 时,MSF 和 GS 的控制目标在 MEE 上没有显著差异。从假肢代谢成本的角度来看,最大摆动屈曲或步态对称性都可以成为 IPK 的合适控制目标。