Woods-Hill Charlotte Z, Lee Laura, Xie Anping, King Anne F, Voskertchian Annie, Klaus Sybil A, Smith Michelle M, Miller Marlene R, Colantuoni Elizabeth A, Fackler James C, Milstone Aaron M
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pa.
The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa.
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2018 Oct 16;3(5):e112. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000112. eCollection 2018 Sep-Oct.
Single center work demonstrated a safe reduction in unnecessary blood culture use in critically ill children. Our objective was to develop and implement a customizable quality improvement framework to reduce unnecessary blood culture testing in critically ill children across diverse clinical settings and various institutions.
Three pediatric intensive care units (14 bed medical/cardiac; 28 bed medical; 22 bed cardiac) in 2 institutions adapted and implemented a 5-part Blood Culture Improvement Framework, supported by a coordinating multidisciplinary team. Blood culture rates were compared for 24 months preimplementation to 24 months postimplementation.
Blood culture rates decreased from 13.3, 13.5, and 11.5 cultures per 100 patient-days preimplementation to 6.4, 9.1, and 8.3 cultures per 100 patient-days postimplementation for Unit A, B, and C, respectively; a decrease of 32% (95% confidence interval, 25-43%; < 0.001) for the 3 units combined. Postimplementation, the proportion of total blood cultures drawn from central venous catheters decreased by 51% for the 3 units combined (95% confidence interval, 29-66%; < 0.001). Notable difference between units included the identity and involvement of the project champion, adaptions of the clinical tools, and staff monitoring and communication of project progress. Qualitative data also revealed a core set of barriers and facilitators to behavior change around pediatric intensive care unit blood culture practices.
Three pediatric intensive units adapted a novel 5-part improvement framework and successfully reduced blood culture use in critically ill children, demonstrating that different providers and practice environments can adapt diagnostic stewardship programs.
单中心研究表明,在危重症儿童中安全减少不必要的血培养使用是可行的。我们的目标是开发并实施一个可定制的质量改进框架,以减少不同临床环境和各类机构中危重症儿童不必要的血培养检测。
两家机构的三个儿科重症监护病房(一个14张床位的医疗/心脏科病房;一个28张床位的医疗病房;一个22张床位的心脏科病房)采用并实施了一个由多学科协调团队支持的五部分血培养改进框架。比较了实施前24个月和实施后24个月的血培养率。
A、B、C三个病房的血培养率分别从实施前每100患者日13.3次、13.5次和11.5次降至实施后每100患者日6.4次、9.1次和8.3次;三个病房综合下降了32%(95%置信区间,25 - 43%;P < 0.001)。实施后,三个病房综合从中心静脉导管采集的血培养占总血培养的比例下降了51%(95%置信区间,29 - 66%;P < 0.001)。各病房之间的显著差异包括项目负责人的身份和参与度、临床工具的调整以及工作人员对项目进展的监测和沟通。定性数据还揭示了围绕儿科重症监护病房血培养实践行为改变的一系列核心障碍和促进因素。
三个儿科重症监护病房采用了一个新颖的五部分改进框架,并成功减少了危重症儿童的血培养使用量,表明不同的医疗服务提供者和实践环境可以采用诊断管理计划。