Yu Wei, Zhao Lin
School of Geography and Tourism, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, Shandong, China.
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Dec;29(12):4119-4127. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201812.019.
To explore the coordination between urbanization quality and resource utilization and its influencing factors from the perspective of inclusiveness is conducive to expanding the connotation of urbanization quality, which could provide guidance for improving the quality of urbanization. By integrating the concept of inclusiveness into the connotation of urbanization quality and resource utilization, we analyzed the spatial pattern of the coordination of urbanization quality and resource utilization in 288 cities above prefecture level in China with the GIS technology and coordination degree model, with the potential causes being discussed. The results showed that the inclusive level of China's urbanization development was low, which was characterized by unequal development opportunities, scattered distribution of high-level cities and large-scale centralized distribution of low-level cities. The overall utilization of resources was at the middle level. The agglomeration chara-cteristics of high- and low-level cities were significant and bounded by Hu Huanyong line. The average coordination degree of urbanization quality and resource utilization was 0.59, which belonged to the medium level, with the grade-difference and the east-west gradient pattern. Urban distribution with high coordination level fitted southeast coastal urban agglomerations well. The distribution of cities above the middle level was in good agreement with that of the "T" type axial belt in China formed by the southeastern coast of China and the Yangtze River economic belt. The lower level cities were concentrated in the middle and upper reaches of the Yellow River, Jiangnan hills, north-west part of the Northeast and Yungui Plateau. The level of urban administration and the level of economic development were positively related to the coordination between urbanization quality and resource utilization. There was a significant correlation between the urban scale and the level of coordination in the city with more than 3 million population.
从包容性视角探讨城镇化质量与资源利用的协调性及其影响因素，有利于拓展城镇化质量内涵，为提升城镇化质量提供指导。通过将包容性理念融入城镇化质量与资源利用内涵，运用GIS技术和协调度模型，分析了中国288个地级及以上城市城镇化质量与资源利用的协调空间格局，并探讨了潜在原因。结果表明，中国城镇化发展的包容性水平较低，表现为发展机会不均等、高水平城市分布分散、低水平城市大规模集中分布。资源总体利用处于中等水平。高低水平城市的集聚特征显著，以胡焕庸线为界。城镇化质量与资源利用的平均协调度为0.59，属于中等水平，存在等级差异和东西梯度格局。协调水平高的城市分布与东南沿海城市群契合度较好。中等水平以上城市的分布与中国由东南沿海和长江经济带构成的“T”型轴带分布吻合度较高。较低水平城市集中在黄河中上游、江南丘陵、东北西北部和云贵高原。城市行政等级和经济发展水平与城镇化质量和资源利用的协调性呈正相关。在人口超过300万的城市中，城市规模与协调水平存在显著相关性。
