Suppr超能文献

医生应如何运用其权力来命名一种污名化诊断并应对患者的经历?

How Should Physicians Use Their Authority to Name a Stigmatizing Diagnosis and Respond to a Patient's Experience?

作者信息

Bartels Jane, Ryan Christopher J

机构信息

An advanced trainee in consultation-liaison psychiatry at Westmead Hospital in Sydney, Australia.

A clinical associate professor at the University of Sydney and the director of the Westmead Hospital Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry Service in Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

AMA J Ethics. 2018 Dec 1;20(12):E1119-1125. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2018.1119.

Abstract

Patients with delusional infestation are unlikely to agree to take the mainstay of treatment-antipsychotic medication. While stressing the general importance of truth telling in medicine, we suggest that, in some cases of delusional infestation, patients' lack of decision-making capacity will-provided a series of criteria are met-justify briefly withholding their diagnosis. We acknowledge this action as a kind of deception with ethical pitfalls and discuss those related to prescribing antipsychotic medication without frank disclosure. We recommend full disclosure of a delusional infestation diagnosis when the patient is recovered, despite this action's potential to exacerbate stigma.

摘要

患有妄想性寄生虫病的患者不太可能同意接受治疗的主要手段——抗精神病药物治疗。在强调医学中讲真话的普遍重要性的同时,我们建议,在某些妄想性寄生虫病病例中,如果满足一系列标准,患者缺乏决策能力可以作为暂时隐瞒其诊断的正当理由。我们承认这一行为是一种存在伦理陷阱的欺骗行为,并讨论与在未坦诚告知的情况下开具抗精神病药物相关的问题。我们建议在患者康复后完全披露妄想性寄生虫病的诊断,尽管这一行为可能会加剧污名化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验