Turris Sheila A, Callaghan Christopher W, Rabb Haddon, Munn Matthew Brendan, Lund Adam
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mass Gathering Medicine Interest Group, Department of Emergency Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2019 Feb;34(1):72-81. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18001188. Epub 2018 Dec 27.
Music festivals are globally attended events that bring together performers and fans for a defined period of time. These festivals often have on-site medical care to help reduce the impact on local health care systems. Historically, the literature suggests that patient transfers off-site are frequently related to complications of substance use. However, there is a gap in understanding why patients are transferred to hospital when an on-site medical team, capable of providing first aid services blended with a higher level of care (HLC) team, is present.
The purpose of this study is to better understand patterns of injuries and illnesses that necessitate transfer when physician-led HLC teams are accessible on-site.
This is a prospective, descriptive case series analyzing patient encounter documentation from four large-scale, North American, multi-day music festivals.
RESULTS/DISCUSSION: On-site medical teams that included HLC team members were present for the duration of each festival, so every team was able to "treat and release" when clinically appropriate. Over the course of the combined 34 event days, there were 10,406 patient encounters resulting in 156 individuals being transferred off-site for assessment, diagnostic testing, and/or treatment. A minority of patients seen were transferred off-site (1.5%). The patient presentation rate (PPR) was 16.5/1,000. The ambulance transfer rate (ATR) was 0.12/1,000 attendees, whereas the total transfer-to-hospital rate (TTHR), when factoring in non-ambulance transport, was 0.25/1,000. In contrast to existing literature on transfers from music festivals, the most common reason for transfer off-site was for musculo-skeletal (MSK) injuries (53.8%) that required imaging.
The presence of on-site HLC teams impacted the case mix of patients transferred to hospital, and may reduce the number of transfers for intoxication. Confounding preconceptions, patients in the present study were transferred largely for injuries that required specialized imaging and testing that could not be performed in an out-of-hospital setting. These results suggest that a better understanding of the specific effects on-site HLC teams have on avoiding off-site transfers will aid in improving planning for music festivals. The findings also identify areas for further improvement in on-site care, such as integrated on-site radiology, which could potentially further reduce the impact of music festivals on local health services. The role of non-emergency transport vehicles (NETVs) deserves further attention.TurrisSA, CallaghanCW, RabbH, MunnMB, LundA. On the way out: an analysis of patient transfers from four large-scale North American music festivals over two yearsPrehosp Disaster Med. 2019;34(1):72-81.
音乐节是全球范围内的活动,在特定时间段内汇聚了表演者和粉丝。这些音乐节通常设有现场医疗服务,以帮助减轻对当地医疗系统的影响。从历史文献来看,患者转至场外就医往往与药物使用并发症有关。然而,当现场有能够提供急救服务并配备高级护理(HLC)团队的医疗团队时,对于为何仍有患者被转往医院,目前尚缺乏相关理解。
本研究旨在更好地了解在现场有医生主导的HLC团队时,需要转院的伤病模式。
这是一项前瞻性描述性病例系列研究,分析了来自北美四个大型多日音乐节的患者诊疗记录。
结果/讨论:每个音乐节期间都有包含HLC团队成员的现场医疗团队,因此每个团队在临床情况合适时都能够“治疗并放行”。在总计34个活动日期间,共发生了10406次患者诊疗,其中156人被转至场外进行评估、诊断测试和/或治疗。接受诊疗的患者中少数被转至场外(1.5%)。患者就诊率(PPR)为16.5/1000。救护车转运率(ATR)为0.12/1000名参与者,而计入非救护车转运后的总转院率(TTHR)为0.25/1000。与现有关于音乐节转院情况的文献不同,转至场外最常见的原因是需要成像检查的肌肉骨骼(MSK)损伤(53.8%)。
现场HLC团队的存在影响了转往医院的患者病例组合,并可能减少因中毒导致的转院人数。与先入之见不同的是,本研究中的患者大多因需要在院外无法进行的专门成像和检测的损伤而被转院。这些结果表明,更好地了解现场HLC团队对避免场外转院所产生的具体影响,将有助于改进音乐节的规划。研究结果还确定了现场护理方面有待进一步改进的领域,如整合现场放射科,这有可能进一步减轻音乐节对当地医疗服务的影响。非紧急运输车辆(NETV)的作用值得进一步关注。
图里斯SA,卡拉汉CW,拉布H,芒恩MB,伦德A。离场途中:对北美四个大型音乐节两年内患者转院情况的分析。《院前灾难医学》。2019;34(1):72 - 81。