Cheng Ting, Li Yong, Pang Shuai, Wan Huan Ying, Shi Guo Chao, Cheng Qi Jian, Li Qing Yun, Pan Zi Lai, Huang Shao Guang
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ruijin Hospital North, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China,
School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Dec 17;14:13-26. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S157141. eCollection 2019.
The diagnostic value of emphysema extent in consistent air flow limitation remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to assess the value of emphysema extent on computed tomography (CT) on the diagnosis of persistent airflow limitation. Furthermore, we developed a diagnostic criterion for further verification.
We retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent chest CT and lung function test. To be specific, 671 patients were enrolled in the derivation group (Group 1.1), while 479 patients were in the internal validation group (Group 1.2). The percentage of lung volume occupied by low attenuation areas (LAA%) and the percentile of the histogram of attenuation values were calculated.
In patients with persistent airflow limitation, the LAA% was higher and the percentile of the histogram of attenuation values was lower, compared with patients without persistent airflow limitation. Using LAA% with a threshold of -950 HU >1.4% as the criterion, the sensitivity was 44.3% and 47.2%, and the specificity was 95.2% and 95.7%, in Group 1.1 and Group 1.2, respectively. The specificity was influenced by the coexistence of interstitial lung disease, pneumothorax, and post-surgery, rather than the coexistence of pneumonia, nodule, or mass. Multivariable models were also developed.
The emphysema extent on CT is a highly specific marker in the diagnosis of persistent airflow limitation.
肺气肿程度在持续性气流受限中的诊断价值仍存在争议。因此,我们旨在评估计算机断层扫描(CT)上肺气肿程度对持续性气流受限诊断的价值。此外,我们制定了一项诊断标准以供进一步验证。
我们回顾性纳入了接受胸部CT和肺功能检查的患者。具体而言,671例患者被纳入推导组(1.1组),而479例患者被纳入内部验证组(1.2组)。计算低衰减区域占肺体积的百分比(LAA%)和衰减值直方图的百分位数。
与无持续性气流受限的患者相比,持续性气流受限患者的LAA%更高,衰减值直方图的百分位数更低。以LAA%>1.4%且阈值为-950 HU作为标准,1.1组和1.2组的敏感性分别为44.3%和47.2%,特异性分别为95.2%和95.7%。特异性受间质性肺疾病、气胸和术后并存情况的影响,而非肺炎、结节或肿块并存情况的影响。还建立了多变量模型。
CT上的肺气肿程度是持续性气流受限诊断中一个高度特异的标志物。