Zafar Uffan, Abid Aneesa, Ahmad Burza, Ahmad Hafiz Ali, Zafar Fariha, Baig Muhammad Usman, Akram Saba
Radiology, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Quaid-E-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, PAK.
Psychiatry, Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Quaid-E-Azam Medical College, Bahawalpur, PAK.
Cureus. 2018 Oct 20;10(10):e3470. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3470.
Introduction A lot of radiation exposure to a population comes from medical sources. Clinicians must justify the need for radiology procedures on a request form to prevent unnecessary scans and radiation exposure. Moreover, the properly-filled form will help to identify the patient correctly and provide clinical details to make a radiological diagnosis. Objective The purpose of the study was to audit the computed tomography (CT) scan request forms and find out the adequacy of completion of the request forms at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan. Materials and methods We scrutinized 300 CT scan request forms received at the tertiary care center, Bahawal Victoria Hospital. We checked the adequacy of filling of different fields in the request forms like name, address, clinical and surgical history, and the name of required examination. We also looked for the missing subjects in the CT request form currently used in our hospital like the contact numbers of the patient and the doctor, the identity of the requesting doctor, renal function tests (RFTs), last menstrual period (LMP), and history of allergy. The results were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 20 (SPSS 20) (IBM, NY, USA) and Microsoft Office Excel Worksheet (Microsoft Corporation, NM, USA). Results The name of the patient was present in 100% of the request forms, surname in 27.66%, age in 73.33%, gender in 64.33%, date in 91.66%, bed number in 37.90%, address in 1% and the name of required examination in 99.6%. Information about diagnosis included clinical history in 50.66%, past surgical history in 1%, laboratory investigations in 1%, and clinical examination in 8.66% of the forms. All the forms had the name and signature of the referring consultant, but only 10.33% forms contained the identity of the requesting junior doctor. More than half of the request forms for CT scan provided RFTs. We found no record of the allergy, LMP, and the contact number of the doctor and the patient. Conclusion The information provided in the CT scan request forms was inadequate. The practice of filling these forms needs to be improved to protect the patients from unnecessary radiation exposure.
引言
人群所遭受的大量辐射来自医疗源。临床医生必须在申请表上说明进行放射学检查的必要性,以防止不必要的扫描和辐射暴露。此外,填写完整的申请表有助于正确识别患者,并提供临床细节以进行放射学诊断。
目的
本研究的目的是审核计算机断层扫描(CT)申请单,并了解巴基斯坦巴哈瓦尔布尔市巴哈瓦尔维多利亚医院申请单填写的完整性。
材料与方法
我们仔细审查了在三级医疗中心巴哈瓦尔维多利亚医院收到的300份CT扫描申请单。我们检查了申请单中不同字段的填写完整性,如姓名、地址、临床和手术史以及所需检查的名称。我们还查找了我院目前使用的CT申请单中缺失的项目,如患者和医生的联系电话、申请医生的身份、肾功能检查(RFT)、末次月经日期(LMP)和过敏史。使用社会科学统计软件包20(SPSS 20)(美国纽约IBM公司)和Microsoft Office Excel工作表(美国新墨西哥州Microsoft Corporation)对结果进行分析。
结果
100%的申请单上有患者姓名,27.66%有姓氏,73.33%有年龄,64.33%有性别,91.66%有日期,37.90%有床位号,1%有地址,99.6%有所需检查的名称。关于诊断的信息,50.66%的表格中有临床病史,1%有既往手术史,1%有实验室检查结果,8.66%有临床检查情况。所有表格都有转诊顾问的姓名和签名,但只有10.33%的表格包含申请的初级医生的身份信息。超过一半的CT扫描申请单提供了肾功能检查结果。我们未发现过敏、末次月经日期以及医生和患者联系电话的记录。
结论
CT扫描申请单所提供的信息不完整。需要改进填写这些表格的做法,以保护患者免受不必要的辐射暴露。