National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, U.K.
National Institute for Health Research Respiratory Biomedical Research Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust and Imperial College London, Sydney Street, London SW3 6NP, U.K.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2019 Jun;94(3):1038-1055. doi: 10.1111/brv.12489. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
Skeletal muscle wasting is a common clinical feature of many chronic diseases and also occurs in response to single acute events. The accompanying loss of strength can lead to significant disability, increased care needs and have profound negative effects on quality of life. As muscle is the most abundant source of amino acids in the body, it appears to function as a buffer for fuel and substrates that can be used to repair damage elsewhere and to feed the immune system. In essence, the fundamentals of muscle wasting are simple: less muscle is made than is broken down. However, although well-described mechanisms modulate muscle protein turnover, significant individual differences in the amount of muscle lost in the presence of a given severity of disease complicate the understanding of underlying mechanisms and suggest that individuals have different sensitivities to signals for muscle loss. Furthermore, the rate at which muscle protein is turned over under normal conditions means that clinically significant muscle loss can occur with changes in the rate of protein synthesis and/or breakdown that are too small to be measurable. Consequently, the changes in expression of factors regulating muscle turnover required to cause a decline in muscle mass are small and, except in cases of rapid wasting, there is no consistent pattern of change in the expression of factors that regulate muscle mass. MicroRNAs are fine tuners of cell phenotype and are therefore ideally suited to cause the subtle changes in proteome required to tilt the balance between synthesis and degradation in a way that causes clinically significant wasting. Herein we present a model in which muscle loss as a consequence of disease in non-muscle tissue is modulated by a set of microRNAs, the muscle expression of which is associated with severity of disease in the non-muscle tissue. These microRNAs alter fundamental biological processes including the synthesis of ribosomes and mitochondria leading to reduced protein synthesis and increased protein breakdown, thereby freeing amino acids from the muscle. We argue that the variability in muscle loss observed in the human population arises from at least two sources. The first is from pre-existing or disease-induced variation in the expression of microRNAs controlling the sensitivity of muscle to the atrophic signal and the second is from the expression of microRNAs from imprinted loci (i.e. only expressed from the maternally or paternally inherited allele) and may control the rate of myonuclear recruitment. In the absence of disease, these factors do not correlate with muscle mass, since there is no challenge to the established balance. However, in the presence of such a challenge, these microRNAs determine the rate of decline for a given disease severity. Together these mechanisms provide novel insight into the loss of muscle mass and its variation in the human population. The involvement of imprinted loci also suggests that genes that regulate early development also contribute to the ability of individuals to resist muscle loss in response to disease.
骨骼肌减少是许多慢性疾病的常见临床特征,也会对单一急性事件产生反应。随之而来的力量丧失会导致严重的残疾、增加护理需求,并对生活质量产生深远的负面影响。由于肌肉是体内氨基酸最丰富的来源,它似乎是燃料和底物的缓冲器,可以用来修复其他部位的损伤,并为免疫系统提供营养。从本质上讲,肌肉减少的基本原理很简单:合成的肌肉少于分解的肌肉。然而,尽管描述良好的机制调节肌肉蛋白周转,但在给定疾病严重程度下,肌肉减少的个体差异很大,这使得对潜在机制的理解变得复杂,并表明个体对肌肉减少的信号有不同的敏感性。此外,在正常条件下,肌肉蛋白周转率很高,以至于蛋白质合成和/或分解率的微小变化都可能导致临床上显著的肌肉损失,而这些变化太小,无法测量。因此,导致肌肉质量下降所需的调节肌肉周转的因素表达变化很小,除了快速消耗的情况外,调节肌肉质量的因素表达没有一致的变化模式。microRNAs 是细胞表型的微调因子,因此非常适合引起蛋白质组中微妙的变化,从而使合成和降解之间的平衡倾斜,导致临床上显著的消耗。在这里,我们提出了一个模型,其中非肌肉组织疾病导致的肌肉损失受到一组 microRNAs 的调节,这些 microRNAs 在非肌肉组织中的表达与疾病的严重程度相关。这些 microRNAs 改变了基本的生物学过程,包括核糖体和线粒体的合成,导致蛋白质合成减少和蛋白质分解增加,从而将氨基酸从肌肉中释放出来。我们认为,在人类群体中观察到的肌肉损失的可变性至少有两个来源。第一个是由控制肌肉对萎缩信号敏感性的 microRNAs 的预先存在或疾病诱导的表达变化引起的,第二个是由印迹基因座(即仅从母系或父系遗传等位基因表达)的 microRNAs 表达引起的,可能控制肌核募集的速度。在没有疾病的情况下,这些因素与肌肉质量无关,因为没有对既定平衡构成挑战。然而,在存在这种挑战的情况下,这些 microRNAs 决定了给定疾病严重程度的下降速度。这些机制共同为肌肉质量的丧失及其在人类群体中的变化提供了新的见解。印迹基因座的参与也表明,调节早期发育的基因也有助于个体抵抗疾病引起的肌肉损失的能力。