BACKGROUND

Implants offer a method for augmenting abdominal flaps in the setting of deficient volume in breast reconstruction. They may be placed immediately at the time of reconstruction or on a delayed basis. The authors seek to compare outcomes from a single surgeon and previously published studies.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed, querying multiple databases. A retrospective review was conducted for patients who underwent abdominally based flap breast reconstruction and implant placement between July of 2005 and August of 2015 performed by the senior author (M.Y.N.).

RESULTS

A systematic review of the literature yielded four articles, for a total of 96 patients (142 breasts) included for systematic review. Eighty-seven breasts (61 percent) were reconstructed with immediate implant at the time of flap reconstruction and 55 breasts (39 percent) had a staged approach to implant placement. Complications were noted in 28 breasts (32 percent) following immediate placement and in 10 breasts (18 percent) following staged placement. A total of 53 patients (79 breasts) were retrospectively reviewed, all of whom underwent reconstruction in a staged manner. Twelve breasts (15 percent) were found to have a flap- or implant-related complication; 97.5 percent of implants/flap reconstructions were successful, with a 54 percent revision rate. When pooling systematic and retrospective data, there was a significant difference in complication rates between the staged and immediate reconstruction cohorts (p < 0.001) in favor of the staged approach.

CONCLUSIONS

The literature supports a higher rate of implant-related complications following immediate implantation at the time of flap reconstruction. The authors' experience with implant placement highlights the safety and effectiveness of the staged approach.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.