美国的显微外科乳房重建:现状的叙述性综述

Microsurgical breast reconstruction in the United States: a narrative review of the current state.

作者信息

Menon Ambika, Brown Ciara A, Losken Albert, Garcia Nores Gabriela Del Pilar

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

出版信息

Gland Surg. 2024 Aug 31;13(8):1535-1551. doi: 10.21037/gs-24-63. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Breast reconstruction with microsurgical techniques allows for autologous reconstruction after mastectomy without the complications associated with alloplastic reconstruction. Autologous reconstruction has undergone significant improvement and now offers patients a variety of options depending on patient specific factors and aesthetic outcomes. This review aims to focus on the history of autologous reconstruction, operative considerations, general surgical techniques for flaps, and indications for choosing the ideal free tissue transfer for all medical specialties and not only plastic surgeons.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Embase databases. Manuscripts that provided objective data with respect to history of microsurgical options, surgical techniques, patient considerations, and contraindications were utilized for this review with the objective to simplify data for all non-plastic surgeon readers.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

In this study, we find that patient selection is critical in successful outcomes for microsurgical breast reconstruction. We find that abdominal free flaps are now considered gold standard for autologous reconstruction. However, reliable alternatives exist for patients who are not considered ideal candidates for this reconstruction. These include thigh-based flaps such as gracilis myocutaneous flaps, profunda artery perforator flaps, lateral thigh perforator flaps and trunk-based flaps such as lumbar artery perforator flap. Postoperative considerations involve clinical monitoring and enhanced recovery after surgery. The rate of reconstructive success and flap viability is greater that 95%, even in high-risk populations, and therefore risk stratification should be performed based on an individual basis. While there are no absolute contraindications to autologous reconstruction, relative contraindications do exist including obesity and elderly populations due to the increased surgical and medical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

While implant-based reconstruction remains the predominant method of breast reconstruction in the United States, there have been many exciting advancements in autologous reconstruction that offers high aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction.

摘要

背景与目的

采用显微外科技术进行乳房重建,可在乳房切除术后实现自体重建,且无假体植入重建相关的并发症。自体重建技术已取得显著进展,现可根据患者的具体因素和美学效果为患者提供多种选择。本综述旨在聚焦自体重建的历史、手术要点、皮瓣的一般外科技术,以及为所有医学专业(而非仅整形外科医生)选择理想的游离组织移植的指征。

方法

使用PubMed和Embase数据库对文献进行全面检索。本综述采用了提供关于显微外科手术选择历史、手术技术、患者因素和禁忌证等客观数据的手稿,目的是为所有非整形外科医生的读者简化数据。

关键内容与发现

在本研究中,我们发现患者选择对于显微外科乳房重建的成功结果至关重要。我们发现,腹部游离皮瓣目前被认为是自体重建的金标准。然而,对于不被视为该重建理想候选人的患者,也存在可靠的替代方案。这些替代方案包括基于大腿的皮瓣,如股薄肌肌皮瓣、旋股外侧动脉穿支皮瓣、股外侧穿支皮瓣,以及基于躯干的皮瓣,如腰动脉穿支皮瓣。术后注意事项包括临床监测和术后加速康复。即使在高危人群中,重建成功率和皮瓣存活率也超过95%,因此应根据个体情况进行风险分层。虽然自体重建没有绝对禁忌证,但相对禁忌证确实存在,包括肥胖和老年人群体,因为手术和医疗并发症会增加。

结论

虽然在美国,基于植入物的重建仍然是乳房重建的主要方法,但自体重建已经取得了许多令人兴奋的进展,可提供高美学效果和患者满意度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1529/11399014/3a1d85c137bb/gs-13-08-1535-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索