Laboratory of Brain and Cognition, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Department of Bio and Brain Engineering, College of Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Sep 13;29(10):4452-4461. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy325.
Memory retrieval is thought to depend on interactions between hippocampus and cortex, but the nature of representation in these regions and their relationship remains unclear. Here, we performed an ultra-high field fMRI (7T) experiment, comprising perception, learning and retrieval sessions. We observed a fundamental difference between representations in hippocampus and high-level visual cortex during perception and retrieval. First, while object-selective posterior fusiform cortex showed consistent responses that allowed us to decode object identity across both perception and retrieval one day after learning, object decoding in hippocampus was much stronger during retrieval than perception. Second, in visual cortex but not hippocampus, there was consistency in response patterns between perception and retrieval, suggesting that substantial neural populations are shared for both perception and retrieval. Finally, the decoding in hippocampus during retrieval was not observed when retrieval was tested on the same day as learning suggesting that the retrieval process itself is not sufficient to elicit decodable object representations. Collectively, these findings suggest that while cortical representations are stable between perception and retrieval, hippocampal representations are much stronger during retrieval, implying some form of reorganization of the representations between perception and retrieval.
记忆检索被认为依赖于海马体和大脑皮层之间的相互作用,但这些区域中的表示形式及其关系仍不清楚。在这里,我们进行了一项超高场 fMRI(7T)实验,包括感知、学习和检索阶段。我们在感知和检索过程中观察到了海马体和高级视觉皮层之间的表示存在根本差异。首先,虽然选择性后外侧梭状回在学习后一天的感知和检索过程中表现出一致的反应,使我们能够对物体身份进行解码,但海马体中的物体解码在检索过程中比感知过程强得多。其次,在视觉皮层而不是海马体中,感知和检索之间的反应模式具有一致性,表明大量的神经群体在感知和检索中共享。最后,当检索在与学习相同的当天进行测试时,在海马体中没有观察到检索期间的解码,这表明检索过程本身不足以引起可解码的物体表示。总的来说,这些发现表明,虽然皮层表示在感知和检索之间是稳定的,但在检索过程中,海马体的表示要强得多,这意味着在感知和检索之间,代表形式发生了某种形式的重组。