• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[通过超声检查、闪烁扫描、计算机断层扫描和肝酶检测妇科肿瘤中的肝转移]

[Detection of liver metastases in gynecologic neoplasms by sonography, scintigraphy, computerized tomography and liver enzymes].

作者信息

Schillinger H, Traeder R, Klosa W, Pohl J

机构信息

Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Freiburg.

出版信息

Onkologie. 1988 Oct;11(5):216-20. doi: 10.1159/000216527.

DOI:10.1159/000216527
PMID:3059249
Abstract

In a retrospective study the diagnostic validity of sonography (US), computer-tomography (CT), scintigraphy (SC) and serum alkaline phosphatase (AP) in the detection of liver metastases was evaluated in 929 patients with malignant tumors: ovary (n = 367), mamma (n = 189), endometrium (n = 181), cervix (n = 162), fallopian tube (n = 10), vulva (n = 20). Definitive diagnosis was confirmed by autopsy (n = 51), surgical intervention (n = 297) or follow-up (n = 581). Specificity, sensitivity and overall accuracy of the different methods in the indication of liver metastasis were as follows: CT (n = 58) 81%, 98%, 93%, US (n = 929) 70%, 94%, 90%, SC (n = 512) 66%, 85%, 81%, AP (n = 325) 68%, 93%, 87%. In the last examination period, US and CT reached comparable results. In view of efficiency, AP and US would appear suitable for routine control in gynecological malignancies.

摘要

在一项回顾性研究中,对929例患有恶性肿瘤的患者(卵巢癌367例、乳腺癌189例、子宫内膜癌181例、宫颈癌162例、输卵管癌10例、外阴癌20例)进行了超声检查(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)、闪烁扫描(SC)和血清碱性磷酸酶(AP)检测肝转移的诊断有效性评估。最终诊断通过尸检(51例)、手术干预(297例)或随访(581例)得以证实。不同方法在指示肝转移方面的特异性、敏感性和总体准确性如下:CT(58例)81%、98%、93%;US(929例)70%、94%、90%;SC(512例)66%、85%、81%;AP(325例)68%、93%、87%。在最后一个检查阶段,US和CT的结果相当。考虑到效率,AP和US似乎适用于妇科恶性肿瘤的常规检查。

相似文献

1
[Detection of liver metastases in gynecologic neoplasms by sonography, scintigraphy, computerized tomography and liver enzymes].[通过超声检查、闪烁扫描、计算机断层扫描和肝酶检测妇科肿瘤中的肝转移]
Onkologie. 1988 Oct;11(5):216-20. doi: 10.1159/000216527.
2
Diagnostic value of transverse axial tomoscintigraphy for the detection of hepatic metastases: results on 53 examinations and comparison with other diagnostic techniques.
Eur J Nucl Med. 1981;6(10):435-52. doi: 10.1007/BF00252801.
3
Utility of abdominal imaging to assess for liver metastasis in patients with head and neck cancer and abnormal liver function tests.腹部成像在评估头颈部癌且肝功能检查异常患者肝转移情况中的应用
Am J Otolaryngol. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):137-40. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2013.10.004. Epub 2013 Oct 29.
4
Liver function tests in patients with computed tomography demonstrated hepatic metastases.计算机断层扫描显示有肝转移的患者的肝功能检查结果。
Gastrointest Radiol. 1989 Winter;14(1):55-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01889155.
5
Detection of hepatic metastases: comparison of EOE-13 computed tomography and scintigraphy.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1983 Nov;141(5):931-5. doi: 10.2214/ajr.141.5.931.
6
[Reliability of sonography in diagnosing liver metastases in breast and bronchial cancer. A retrospective comparison of physical examination, laboratory tests and liver scintigraphy].[超声检查对乳腺癌和支气管癌肝转移的诊断可靠性。体格检查、实验室检查和肝脏闪烁扫描的回顾性比较]
Ultraschall Med. 1986 Dec;7(6):293-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1013970.
7
Liver function tests in metastatic uveal melanoma.转移性葡萄膜黑色素瘤的肝功能检查
Am J Ophthalmol. 2004 Feb;137(2):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.08.045.
8
Computed tomography, ultrasound, and scintigraphy of the liver in patients with colon or breast carcinoma: a prospective comparison.结肠癌或乳腺癌患者肝脏的计算机断层扫描、超声检查和闪烁扫描:一项前瞻性比较。
Radiology. 1983 Oct;149(1):225-30. doi: 10.1148/radiology.149.1.6611929.
9
An analysis of imaging studies and liver function tests to detect hepatic neoplasia.
Dig Dis Sci. 1987 Oct;32(10):1113-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01300197.
10
Value of liver function tests in the diagnosis of hepatic metastases in patients with gastric cancer.
Acta Chir Scand. 1972;138(6):604-8.