Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Vanderbilt Medical School, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2019 Aug;38(8):2133-2140. doi: 10.1002/jum.14910. Epub 2018 Dec 28.
Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) is an increasingly integral part of emergency medicine. This study investigated community emergency department physicians' choices regarding ultrasonography as a branch point in clinical decision making.
During shifts covering all days of the week and all time-spans over a 3-month period, emergency department physicians were interviewed whenever POCUS was used. Questions focused on the role of POCUS in clinical management and on tests avoided because of ultrasonography use. Cost savings attributable to POCUS were calculated using Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services and FairHealth data. Anonymization of data precluded follow-up testing to account for misdiagnosis.
On average, POCUS use eliminated $1134.31 of additional testing for privately insured patients, $2826.31 for out-of-network or uninsured patients, and $181.63 for Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services patients. Differences were significant when the total cost of eliminated additional testing was compared to a baseline of no savings (p < .001). Aggregate cost savings remained significant when analyses were broadened to include POCUS encounters that did not yield changes in management (p < .001).
When physicians' clinical expertise suggests that POCUS may be indicated, its use results in significant cost savings, even in encounters in which management is not directly impacted. POCUS, when incorporated earlier and more frequently into community hospital emergency medicine diagnostic protocols, can lower direct and indirect costs associated with diagnostic workups. Community emergency departments, in particular, would benefit from additional investigation informing specific guidelines for the integration of POCUS into clinical management and the role that this has in cost savings.
床旁超声(POCUS)是急诊医学中越来越重要的组成部分。本研究调查了社区急诊科医生在临床决策中选择超声检查的情况。
在涵盖 3 个月内所有工作日和所有时间段的轮班期间,每当使用 POCUS 时,都会对急诊科医生进行采访。问题集中在 POCUS 在临床管理中的作用以及由于超声检查而避免的检查。使用医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)和 FairHealth 数据计算了 POCUS 带来的成本节约。由于无法进行后续测试以考虑误诊,因此对数据进行了匿名处理。
平均而言,对于私人保险患者,POCUS 的使用可节省 1134.31 美元的额外检查费用,对于非网络或无保险患者可节省 2826.31 美元,对于 CMS 患者可节省 181.63 美元。与无节省的基线相比,当比较消除额外检查总成本时,差异具有统计学意义(p < .001)。当将分析范围扩大到包括未改变管理的 POCUS 检查时,总体成本节约仍然具有统计学意义(p < .001)。
当医生的临床专业知识表明可能需要进行 POCUS 检查时,其使用会带来显著的成本节约,即使在管理未直接受到影响的情况下也是如此。当 POCUS 更早且更频繁地纳入社区医院急诊医学诊断方案时,它可以降低与诊断工作相关的直接和间接成本。特别是社区急诊科,将从进一步的调查中受益,这些调查将为 POCUS 纳入临床管理的具体指南以及它在成本节约中的作用提供信息。