Suppr超能文献

急诊科即时超声:不同医疗专业人员的培训、认知、应用及障碍

Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department: Training, Perceptions, Applications, and Barriers from Different Healthcare Professionals.

作者信息

Healy Jack, Tzeng Ching-Fang Tiffany, Wolfshohl Jon, Shedd Andrew, Lin Judy, Patel Chinmay, Chou Eric H

机构信息

Baylor Scott & White All Saints Medical Center Department of Emergency Medicine Fort Worth USA.

Texas Christian University Burnett School of Medicine Fort Worth USA.

出版信息

J Acute Med. 2024 Jun 1;14(2):74-89. doi: 10.6705/j.jacme.202406_14(2).0003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a valuable tool that assists in diagnosis and management of patients in the emergency department (ED) while being cost-efficient and without the use of ionizing radiation. To discern the opinions and perceptions of ED staff about POCUS applications and barriers, we conducted a cross-sectional survey of employees of 12 EDs in North Texas.

METHODS

Participants completed a 20-item online survey about POCUS with questions pertaining to four domains: (1) employee and training information, (2) perceived benefits, (3) common applications, and (4) barriers to use. Out of 805 eligible ED employees, 103 completed the survey (16.1% response rate).

RESULTS

The results indicated a generally positive perception of POCUS among all employee types. Physician had significant exposure and training of POCUS than non-physician group ( < 0.001). Physicians tend to find cardiac assessments more useful for clinical management than non-physicians (47% vs. 23%, = 0.01), while non-physicians find soft tissue/abscess assessments more useful (27% vs. 9%, = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The most significant barriers to POCUS use were time constraints for physicians and a lack of training for non-physician employees. Our study provides valuable insights into the perceptions of multiple ED professionals, serving as a foundation for promoting POCUS use in the ED.

摘要

背景

床旁超声(POCUS)是一种有价值的工具,可协助急诊科(ED)对患者进行诊断和管理,具有成本效益且无需使用电离辐射。为了了解急诊科工作人员对POCUS应用和障碍的看法,我们对北德克萨斯州12个急诊科的员工进行了横断面调查。

方法

参与者完成了一项关于POCUS的20项在线调查,问题涉及四个领域:(1)员工和培训信息,(2)感知到的益处,(3)常见应用,以及(4)使用障碍。在805名符合条件的急诊科员工中,103人完成了调查(回复率为16.1%)。

结果

结果表明,所有员工类型对POCUS的总体看法较为积极。医生比非医生组有更多的POCUS接触和培训经历(<0.001)。与非医生相比,医生倾向于认为心脏评估对临床管理更有用(47%对23%,=0.01),而非医生则认为软组织/脓肿评估更有用(27%对9%,=0.01)。

结论

POCUS使用的最大障碍是医生的时间限制和非医生员工缺乏培训。我们的研究为多个急诊科专业人员的看法提供了有价值的见解,为在急诊科推广POCUS的使用奠定了基础。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound in Emergency Setting.急诊环境下的胃肠超声
J Clin Med. 2023 Jan 19;12(3):799. doi: 10.3390/jcm12030799.
9
Common and Uncommon Errors in Emergency Ultrasound.急诊超声常见及罕见错误
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;12(3):631. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12030631.
10
Handheld Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Safety Considerations for Creating Guidelines.手持式即时超声:制定指南的安全注意事项。
J Intensive Care Med. 2022 Sep;37(9):1146-1151. doi: 10.1177/08850666221076041. Epub 2022 Feb 4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验