Arezzo Alberto, Bullano Alberto, Cochetti Giovanni, Cirocchi Roberto, Randolph Justus, Mearini Ettore, Evangelista Andrea, Ciccone Giovannino, Bonjer H Jaap, Morino Mario
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, Corso Achille Mario Dogliotti 14, Turin, Italy, 10126.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 30;12(12):CD011668. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011668.pub2.
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is an accepted treatment worldwide for adrenal gland disease in adults. The transperitoneal approach is more common. The retroperitoneal approach may be preferred, to avoid entering the peritoneum, but no clear advantage has been demonstrated so far.
To assess the effects of laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy (LTPA) versus laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy (LRPA) for adrenal tumours in adults.
We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ICTRP Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov to 3 April 2018. We applied no language restrictions.
Two review authors independently scanned the abstract, title, or both sections of every record retrieved to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on laparoscopic adrenalectomy for preoperatively assessed adrenal tumours. Participants were affected by corticoid and medullary, benign and malignant, functional and silent tumours or masses of the adrenal gland, which were assessed by both laboratory and imaging studies.
Two review authors independently extracted data, assessed trials for risk of bias, and evaluated overall study quality using GRADE criteria. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, or the mean difference (MD) for continuous variables, and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). We primarily used a random-effects model for pooling data.
We examined 1069 publications, scrutinized 42 full-text publications or records, and included five RCTs. Altogether, 244 participants entered the five trials; 127 participants were randomised to retroperitoneal adrenalectomy and 117 participants to transperitoneal adrenalectomy. Two trials had a follow-up of nine months, and three trials a follow-up of 31 to 70 months. Most participants were women, and the average age was around 40 years. Three trials reported all-cause mortality; in two trials, there were no deaths, and in one trial with six years of follow-up, four participants died in the LRPA group and one participant in the LTPA group (164 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report all-cause morbidity. Therefore, we analysed early and late morbidity, and included specific adverse events under these outcome measures. The results were inconclusive between LRPA and LTPA for early morbidity (usually reported within 30 to 60 days after surgery; RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.16; P = 0.12; 5 trials, 244 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Nine out of 127 participants (7.1%) in the LRPA group, compared with 16 out of 117 participants (13.7%) in the LTPA group experienced an adverse event. Participants in the LRPA group may have a lower risk of developing late morbidity (reported as latest available follow-up; RR 0.12, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.92; P = 0.04; 3 trials, 146 participants; very low-quality evidence). None of the 78 participants in the LRPA group, compared with 7 of the 68 participants (10.3%) in the LTPA group experienced an adverse event.None of the trials reported health-related quality of life. The results were inconclusive for socioeconomic effects, assessed as time to return to normal activities and length of hospital stay, between the intervention and comparator groups (very low-certainty evidence). Participants who had LRPA may have had an earlier start on oral fluid or food intake (MD -8.6 hr, 95% CI -13.5 to -3.7; P = 0.0006; 2 trials, 89 participants), and ambulation (MD -5.4 hr, 95% CI -6.8 to -4.0 hr; P < 0.0001; 2 trials, 89 participants) than those in the LTPA groups. Postoperative and operative parameters (duration of surgery, operative blood loss, conversion to open surgery) showed inconclusive results between the intervention and comparator groups.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The body of evidence on laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy compared with laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy is limited. Late morbidity might be reduced following laparoscopic retroperitoneal adrenalectomy, but we are uncertain about this effect because of very low-quality evidence. The effects on other key outcomes, such as all-cause mortality, early morbidity, socioeconomic effects, and operative and postoperative parameters are uncertain. LRPA might show a shorter time to oral fluid or food intake and time to ambulation, but we are uncertain whether this finding can be replicated. New long-term RCTs investigating additional data, such as health-related quality of life, surgeons' level of experience, treatment volume of surgical centres, and details on techniques used are needed.
腹腔镜肾上腺切除术是全球公认的治疗成人肾上腺疾病的方法。经腹腔途径更为常见。后腹腔途径可能更受青睐,以避免进入腹膜,但目前尚未证明其有明显优势。
评估腹腔镜经腹腔肾上腺切除术(LTPA)与腹腔镜后腹腔肾上腺切除术(LRPA)治疗成人肾上腺肿瘤的效果。
我们检索了截至2018年4月3日的Cochrane系统评价数据库(CENTRAL)、医学期刊数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(Embase)、国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP Search Portal)和美国国立医学图书馆临床试验数据库(ClinicalTrials.gov)。我们未设语言限制。
两位综述作者独立浏览检索到的每条记录的摘要、标题或两者,以识别关于术前评估的肾上腺肿瘤的腹腔镜肾上腺切除术的随机对照试验(RCT)。参与者患有肾上腺皮质和髓质、良性和恶性、功能性和无症状性肿瘤或肿块,这些均通过实验室和影像学检查进行评估。
两位综述作者独立提取数据,评估试验的偏倚风险,并使用GRADE标准评估总体研究质量。我们计算二分变量的风险比(RR)或连续变量的平均差(MD)以及相应的95%置信区间(CI)。我们主要使用随机效应模型合并数据。
我们检索了1069篇文献,仔细审查了42篇全文文献或记录,并纳入了5项RCT。共有244名参与者进入这5项试验;127名参与者被随机分配接受后腹腔肾上腺切除术,117名参与者被随机分配接受经腹腔肾上腺切除术。两项试验随访9个月,三项试验随访31至70个月。大多数参与者为女性,平均年龄约为40岁。三项试验报告了全因死亡率;两项试验中无死亡病例,一项随访6年的试验中,后腹腔肾上腺切除术组有4名参与者死亡,经腹腔肾上腺切除术组有1名参与者死亡(164名参与者;低质量证据)。试验未报告全因发病率。因此,我们分析了早期和晚期发病率,并将特定不良事件纳入这些结局指标。后腹腔肾上腺切除术和经腹腔肾上腺切除术在早期发病率方面的结果尚无定论(通常在术后30至60天内报告;RR 0.56,95%CI 0.27至1.16;P = 0.12;5项试验,244名参与者;极低质量证据)。后腹腔肾上腺切除术组127名参与者中有9名(7.1%)发生不良事件,而经腹腔肾上腺切除术组1项7名参与者中有16名(13.7%)发生不良事件。后腹腔肾上腺切除术组参与者发生晚期发病率的风险可能较低(报告为最新可用随访;RR 0.12,95%CI 0.01至0.92;P = 0.04;3项试验,146名参与者;极低质量证据)。后腹腔肾上腺切除术组78名参与者中无人发生不良事件,而经腹腔肾上腺切除术组68名参与者中有7名(10.3%)发生不良事件。没有试验报告与健康相关的生活质量。干预组和对照组在社会经济效应方面(以恢复正常活动的时间和住院时间衡量)的结果尚无定论(极低质量证据)。接受后腹腔肾上腺切除术的参与者可能比经腹腔肾上腺切除术组的参与者更早开始口服液体或食物摄入(MD -8.6小时,95%CI -13.5至-3.7;P = 0.0006;2项试验,89名参与者),且更早开始活动(MD -5.4小时,95%CI -6.8至-4.0小时;P < 0.0001;2项试验,89名参与者)。术后和手术参数(手术持续时间、术中失血量、转为开放手术)在干预组和对照组之间的结果尚无定论。
与腹腔镜经腹腔肾上腺切除术相比关于腹腔镜后腹腔肾上腺切除术的证据有限。腹腔镜后腹腔肾上腺切除术可能会降低晚期发病率,但由于证据质量极低,我们对此效果不确定。对其他关键结局的影响,如全因死亡率、早期发病率、社会经济效应以及手术和术后参数尚不确定。后腹腔肾上腺切除术可能显示口服液体或食物摄入时间和活动时间较短,但我们不确定这一发现是否可重复。需要新的长期随机对照试验来研究更多数据,如与健康相关的生活质量、外科医生的经验水平、手术中心的治疗量以及所用技术的细节。