文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery.

作者信息

Chhabra Anjolie, Roy Chowdhury Apala, Prabhakar Hemanshu, Subramaniam Rajeshwari, Arora Mahesh Kumar, Srivastava Anurag, Kalaivani Mani

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 25;2(2):CD012968. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012968.pub2.


DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012968.pub2
PMID:33629404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8521097/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is one of the most common cancers among women. Surgical removal of the cancer is the mainstay of treatment; however, tumour handling during surgery can cause microscopic dissemination of tumour cells and disease recurrence. The body's hormonal response to surgery (stress response) and general anaesthesia may suppress immunity, promoting tumour dissemination. Paravertebral anaesthesia numbs the site of surgery, provides good analgesia, and blunts the stress response, minimising the need for general anaesthesia. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation compared to general anaesthesia in women undergoing breast cancer surgery, with important outcomes of quality of recovery, postoperative pain at rest, and mortality. SEARCH METHODS: On 6 April 2020, we searched the Specialised Register of the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group (CBCG); CENTRAL (latest issue), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE (via OvidSP); Embase (via OvidSP); the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) search portal; and ClinicalTrials.gov for all prospectively registered and ongoing trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in adult women undergoing breast cancer surgery in which paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation was compared to general anaesthesia. We did not include studies in which paravertebral anaesthesia was given as an adjunct to general anaesthesia and then this was compared to use of general anaesthesia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted details of trial methods and outcome data from eligible trials. When data could be pooled, analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis, and the random-effects model was used if there was heterogeneity. When data could not be pooled, the synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) approach was applied. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Nine studies (614 participants) were included in the review. All were RCTs of parallel design, wherein female patients aged > 18 years underwent breast cancer surgery under paravertebral anaesthesia or general anaesthesia. None of the studies assessed quality of recovery in the first three postoperative days using a validated questionnaire; most assessed factors affecting quality of recovery such as postoperative analgesic use, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), hospital stay, ambulation, and patient satisfaction. Paravertebral anaesthesia may reduce the 24-hour postoperative analgesic requirement (odds ratio (OR) 0.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.01 to 0.34; 5 studies, 305 participants; low-certainty evidence) compared to general anaesthesia. Heterogeneity (I² = 70%) was attributed to the fixed dose of opioids and non-steroidal analgesics administered postoperatively in one study (70 participants), masking a difference in analgesic requirements between groups. Paravertebral anaesthesia probably reduces the incidence of PONV (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.30; 6 studies, 324 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), probably results in a shorter hospital stay (mean difference (MD) -79.39 minutes, 95% CI -107.38 to -51.40; 3 studies, 174 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and probably reduces time to ambulation compared to general anaesthesia (SWiM analysis): percentages indicate vote counting based on direction of effect (100%, 95% CI 51.01% to 100%; P = 0.125; 4 studies, 375 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Paravertebral anaesthesia probably results in higher patient satisfaction (MD 5.52 points, 95% CI 1.30 to 9.75; 3 studies, 129 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) on a 0 to 100 scale 24 hours postoperatively compared to general anaesthesia. Postoperative pain at rest and on movement was assessed at 2, 6, and 24 postoperative hours on a 0 to 10 visual analogue scale (VAS). Four studies (224 participants) found that paravertebral anaesthesia as compared to general anaesthesia probably reduced pain at 2 postoperative hours (MD -2.95, 95% CI -3.37 to -2.54; moderate-certainty evidence). Five studies (324 participants) found that paravertebral anaesthesia may reduce pain at rest at 6 hours postoperatively (MD -1.54, 95% CI -3.20 to 0.11; low-certainty evidence). Five studies (278 participants) found that paravertebral anaesthesia may reduce pain at rest at 24 hours postoperatively (MD -1.19, 95% CI -2.27 to -0.10; low-certainty evidence). Differences in the methods of two studies (119 participants) and addition of clonidine to the local anaesthetic in two studies (109 participants), respectively, contributed to the heterogeneity (I² = 96%) observed for these two outcomes. Two studies (130 participants) found that paravertebral anaesthesia may reduce pain on movement at 6 hours (MD-2.57, 95% CI -3.97 to -1.17) and at 24 hours (MD -2.12, 95% CI -4.80 to 0.55; low-certainty evidence). Heterogeneity (I² = 96%) was observed for both outcomes and could be due to methodological differences between studies. None of the studies reported mortality related to the anaesthetic technique. Eight studies (574 participants) evaluated adverse outcomes with paravertebral anaesthesia: epidural spread (0.7%), minor bleeding (1.4%), pleural puncture not associated with pneumothorax (0.3%), and Horner's syndrome (7.1%). These complications were self-limiting and resolved without treatment. No data are available on disease-free survival, chronic pain, and quality of life. Blinding of personnel or participants was not possible in any study, as a regional anaesthetic technique was compared to general anaesthesia. Risk of bias was judged to be serious, as seven studies had concerns of selection bias and three of detection bias. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Moderate-certainty evidence shows that paravertebral anaesthesia probably reduces PONV, hospital stay, postoperative pain (at 2 hours), and time to ambulation and results in greater patient satisfaction on the first postoperative day compared to general anaesthesia. Paravertebral anaesthesia may also reduce postoperative analgesic use and postoperative pain at 6 and 24 hours at rest and on movement based on low-certainty evidence. However, RCTs using validated questionnaires are needed to confirm these results. Adverse events observed with paravertebral anaesthesia are rare.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Paravertebral anaesthesia with or without sedation versus general anaesthesia for women undergoing breast cancer surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-2-25

[2]
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-2-12

[3]
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19

[4]
Erector spinae plane block for postoperative pain.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-10-9

[5]
Peripheral nerve blocks for postoperative pain after major knee surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014

[6]
Pre-emptive and preventive NSAIDs for postoperative pain in adults undergoing all types of surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021-6-14

[7]
Femoral nerve blocks for acute postoperative pain after knee replacement surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014-5-13

[8]
Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-6-20

[9]
Intravenous versus inhalational maintenance of anaesthesia for postoperative cognitive outcomes in elderly people undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-8-21

[10]
Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-4-25

引用本文的文献

[1]
Comparative analgesic efficacy of erector spinae plane block versus quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic renal cancer surgery: a double-blind randomized trial.

Transl Androl Urol. 2025-7-30

[2]
Research progress of breast cancer surgery during 2010-2024: a bibliometric analysis.

Front Oncol. 2024-12-9

[3]
Evidence-Based Guideline on the Prevention and Management of Perioperative Pain for Breast Cancer Peoples in a Low-Resource Setting: A Systematic Review Article.

Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2023-11-3

[4]
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Pathways for Aesthetic Breast Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-1

[5]
Efficacy and Safety of Nerve Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Breast Cosmetic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2024-1

[6]
Visualization analysis of thoracic paravertebral block in breast surgery based on bibliometrics.

Gland Surg. 2023-1-1

[7]
Clinical Value of Total Intravenous Anesthesia with Sufentanil and Propofol in Radical Mastectomy.

Dis Markers. 2022

[8]
Antitumorigenic Effect of Tramadol and Synergistic Effect With Doxorubicin in Human Breast Cancer Cells.

Front Oncol. 2022-1-26

[9]
Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Breast Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

Pain Res Manag. 2021

[10]
Will ESP block be the gold standard for breast surgery? We are not sure.

Saudi J Anaesth. 2020

本文引用的文献

[1]
PROSPECT guideline for oncological breast surgery: a systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.

Anaesthesia. 2020-1-26

[2]
Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline.

BMJ. 2020-1-16

[3]
Recurrence of breast cancer after regional or general anaesthesia: a randomised controlled trial.

Lancet. 2019-10-20

[4]
Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect.

Evid Based Med. 2017-6

[5]
An Evidence-Based Review of the Efficacy of Perioperative Analgesic Techniques for Breast Cancer-Related Surgery.

Pain Med. 2017-7-1

[6]
Regional anaesthesia and analgesia: relationship to cancer recurrence and survival.

Br J Anaesth. 2015-12

[7]
Long-term Survival for Patients Undergoing Volatile versus IV Anesthesia for Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

Anesthesiology. 2016-1

[8]
Improving Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Breast Surgery: A Mixed-Effects Meta-Analysis.

Pain Physician. 2015

[9]
Paravertebral Catheter for Three-Level Injection in Radical Mastectomy: A Randomised Controlled Study.

PLoS One. 2015-6-9

[10]
Cancer surgery: how may anesthesia influence outcome?

J Clin Anesth. 2015-5

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索