Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;37(10):1846-1849. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.12.044. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
There has been a surge in synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonist (SCRA) exposures reported in recent years. The constituents of SCRA preparations are constantly evolving and rarely confirmed. We sought to characterize the constituents of reported SCRA exposures presenting to the emergency department (ED).
Patients who presented to two academic EDs in Washington, DC with reported or suspected SCRA exposure from July 2015-July 2016 were enrolled at the discretion of the treating provider. Blood and/or urine samples were obtained as part of routine clinical care and sent to the DC medical examiner's office for identification of known SCRAs with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-mass spectrometry. Standard toxicology screens were additionally performed to determine the presence of other drugs of abuse.
128 samples were analyzed. Seventy-one (55.5%) were positive for an SCRA. The most common SCRAs detected were AB-fubinaca (28, 39.4%), ADB-fubinaca (15, 21.1%), AB-chminaca 3-methyl-butanoic acid (15, 21.1%), ADB-chminaca (14, 19.7%), and 5-flouro-PB-22 (8, 11.3%). Fifty-seven (44.5%) samples were negative for an SCRA, of which 28 (21.9%) were positive for another substance, most commonly delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and phencyclidine. An additional 29 (22.7%) patients had both negative SCRA and toxicology screens.
Of patients presenting with reported SCRA intoxication, 55.5% had detectable SCRAs on analytical testing. These results suggest that in a considerable proportion of cases, clinicians are mis-attributing the effects of other drugs or medical conditions to SCRA use. The individual SCRAs detected in our study differed from compounds detected in earlier studies, suggesting there has been a change in constituents.
近年来,合成大麻素受体激动剂(SCRA)暴露的报告数量激增。SCRA 制剂的成分不断变化,且很少得到证实。我们试图描述在急诊室(ED)报告的 SCRA 暴露的成分。
2015 年 7 月至 2016 年 7 月,在华盛顿特区的两家学术性 ED 就诊的报告或疑似 SCRA 暴露的患者,由主治医生酌情决定纳入研究。作为常规临床护理的一部分,采集血液和/或尿液样本,并送至 DC 法医办公室,使用液相色谱-质谱-质谱法鉴定已知的 SCRAs。还进行了标准毒理学筛查,以确定其他滥用药物的存在。
分析了 128 个样本。71 个(55.5%)样本对 SCRA 呈阳性。最常见的检测到的 SCRAs 是 AB-fubinaca(28,39.4%)、ADB-fubinaca(15,21.1%)、AB-chminaca 3-甲基丁酸(15,21.1%)、ADB-chminaca(14,19.7%)和 5-氟-PB-22(8,11.3%)。57 个(44.5%)样本对 SCRA 呈阴性,其中 28 个(21.9%)样本对另一种物质呈阳性,最常见的是 delta-9-四氢大麻酚和苯环利定。另外 29 例(22.7%)患者的 SCRA 和毒理学筛查均为阴性。
在报告的 SCRA 中毒患者中,55.5%的患者在分析检测中可检测到 SCRAs。这些结果表明,在相当一部分病例中,临床医生将其他药物或医疗状况的影响归因于 SCRA 的使用是错误的。我们研究中检测到的个别 SCRAs 与早期研究中检测到的化合物不同,表明成分发生了变化。