a School of Social Work , University of Michigan , Ann Arbor , MI , USA.
b Georgia State University , Atlanta , GA , USA.
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Sep;23(9):1074-1085. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1555696. Epub 2018 Dec 31.
This paper describes a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies that examine the effectiveness of dyadic approaches to life review and reminiscence. The search process began with 1,056 potentially eligible articles and, after a multi-step screening process, led to 20 full-text articles for review. The resulting studies (ten quantitative, nine qualitative, and one mixed-method) comprised six different kinds of dyadic approaches. There are a combination of benefits and problems associated with dyadic life review and reminiscence approaches. This review provides initial understanding of the impact of life review and reminiscence when care recipients and caregivers participate in the intervention together. Future clinical studies on dyadic approaches to life review and reminiscence should provide clearer descriptions of their protocols, include more consistent measures (incorporating in-the-moment measures), and involve populations of healthy older adults and their partners as well as those with cognitive impairment. The inclusion of qualitative studies helps interpret the diverse results reported in the quantitative studies and highlights key themes related to participating in dyadic interventions.
本文对定量和定性研究进行了系统综述，这些研究考察了双元生活回顾和怀旧方法的有效性。搜索过程从 1056 篇潜在的合格文章开始，经过多步筛选过程，最终有 20 篇全文进行了审查。由此产生的研究（10 项定量研究、9 项定性研究和 1 项混合方法研究）包括六种不同类型的双元方法。双元生活回顾和怀旧方法存在一些好处和问题。本综述初步了解了当护理接受者和护理人员一起参与干预时，生活回顾和怀旧的影响。未来关于双元生活回顾和怀旧方法的临床研究应更清楚地描述其方案，包括更一致的措施（纳入即时措施），并涉及健康老年人及其伴侣以及认知障碍患者的人群。定性研究的纳入有助于解释定量研究报告的各种结果，并突出与参与二元干预相关的关键主题。
