Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China.
Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, MNR & Guangxi, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Apr 1;659:74-83. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.329. Epub 2018 Dec 22.
As the concentrated discharge outlet of an aquifer or groundwater system, a karst spring is partly independent from the aquifer, due to its formation of a pool or lake after outcropping onto the surface. Understanding how to evaluate the unique and sensitive environment of the karst spring is essential for water resource protection. Five karst springs in South China were investigated by analyzing their hydrodynamic conditions, variations in physicochemical parameters, and phytoplankton community structures. Dominated by regional or local groundwater flow, these springs had different catchment area characteristics and hydrogeological conditions. The results showed that, although they had similar water quality, their physicochemical parameters needed to be distinguished and evaluated in different ways in order to determine the cause of the observed degradation in spring water quality. Ca, HCO, and specific electrical conductivity were the major parameters reflecting the impact of regional flow from the aquifer; pH, dissolved oxygen, and water temperature indicated the local environment in and around the springs; while nitrogen and COD both related to the aquifer and local environment, depending on seasonal variation and human activities. The comparison of long-term nitrate data revealed that environmental pressure has increased over time. Water deterioration of Lingshui Spring was attributed to the strong interaction of surface water and groundwater. High nutrient concentrations did not correspond with the highest phytoplankton abundance or the most species. The phytoplankton community structures in the karst springs varied from place to place, depending on the hydrogeological conditions and the surrounding environment. The water environment status, as reflected by the combination of water quality indices and biological indicators, could more comprehensively represent overall water health.
作为含水层或地下水系统的集中排泄出口,岩溶泉在出露到地表后形成水池或湖泊,部分与含水层分离。了解如何评估岩溶泉独特而敏感的环境对于水资源保护至关重要。本研究通过分析 5 个中国南方岩溶泉的水动力条件、理化参数变化和浮游植物群落结构,探讨了其环境特征。这些泉受区域或局部地下水流动控制,具有不同的集水区特征和水文地质条件。结果表明,尽管水质相似,但为了确定泉水水质下降的原因,需要对其理化参数进行区分和评估。Ca、HCO 和比电导率是反映含水层区域水流影响的主要参数;pH、溶解氧和水温指示了泉内及周围的局部环境;而氮和 COD 都与含水层和局部环境有关,取决于季节性变化和人类活动。硝酸盐的长期数据对比表明,环境压力随时间推移而增加。陵水泉水质恶化归因于地表水和地下水的强烈相互作用。高养分浓度并不对应于最高的浮游植物丰度或最多的物种。岩溶泉的浮游植物群落结构因水文地质条件和周围环境而异。水质指数和生物指标的组合反映了水环境状况,可以更全面地代表整体水健康。