Furgeson Danielle, Inglehart Marita R
Danielle Furgeson, RDH, MS, DHSc, is Director, Graduate Dental Hygiene Program, and Clinical Assistant Professor, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, University of Michigan; and Marita R. Inglehart, Dr phil habil, is Professor, Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry, and Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychology, College of Literature, Science, and Arts, University of Michigan.
J Dent Educ. 2019 Jan;83(1):5-15. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.002.
A 2014 survey found that dental hygiene program directors perceived interprofessional education (IPE) as a priority for themselves and the dental hygiene profession in the U.S. The aim of this study was to explore whether IPE collaborations in dental hygiene programs and program directors' attitudes changed from 2014 to 2017 since the Commission on Dental Accreditation (CODA) Standard 2-15 on IPE was introduced in August 2016. In May 2017, directors of all 325 U.S. dental hygiene programs were invited to participate in a web-based survey. A total of 117 directors responded, for a 38% response rate, and their responses were then compared with the responses in 2014 (that survey had a 33% response rate). The results showed that, while the percentage of responding dental hygiene programs with a nursing program on campus had decreased (90% to 80%; p<0.022), the likelihood of having other health care-related programs on campus did not change. In 2017 as compared to 2014, the programs were still most likely to collaborate with nursing (50% vs. 46%) and other allied health professions (44% vs. 56%) and in intraprofessional education with dental assisting programs (41% vs. 41%). IPE was still most likely to occur in volunteer activities (68% vs. 73%), basic science courses (65% vs. 60%), and communications training (63% vs. 63%). In 2017, program directors rated IPE as less challenging for programs to manage than in 2014 (on five-point scale with 1=not at all challenging: 3.31 vs. 3.62; p=0.022). However, the responding directors did not view IPE as being as important to the profession in 2017 as the respondents reported in 2014 (3.29 vs. 3.88; p<0.001). The majority in 2017 agreed/strongly agreed that Standard 2-15 will improve the profile of dental hygiene as part of the health care team (77%) and contribute to integrating dental hygiene into interprofessional care (IPC) teams (78%). Overall, this study found that the introduction of an explicit IPE dental hygiene CODA standard in 2016 had already resulted in changes after only one year. However, the responding program directors' lower agreement with statements concerning their graduates' IPC-related competence deserves further attention.
2014年的一项调查发现,美国牙科保健项目主任认为跨专业教育(IPE)对他们自己以及牙科保健行业来说都是一项优先事项。本研究的目的是探讨自牙科认证委员会(CODA)于2016年8月引入关于IPE的标准2-15以来,2014年至2017年期间牙科保健项目中的IPE合作以及项目主任的态度是否发生了变化。2017年5月,邀请了美国所有325个牙科保健项目的主任参与一项基于网络的调查。共有117位主任回复,回复率为38%,然后将他们的回复与2014年的回复进行比较(那次调查的回复率为33%)。结果显示,虽然校园内有护理项目的牙科保健回复项目的百分比有所下降(从90%降至80%;p<0.022),但校园内有其他与医疗保健相关项目的可能性并未改变。与2014年相比,2017年这些项目仍然最有可能与护理专业(50%对46%)和其他联合健康专业(44%对56%)合作,并在与牙科辅助项目的专业内教育方面合作(41%对41%)。IPE仍然最有可能出现在志愿活动(68%对73%)、基础科学课程(65%对60%)以及沟通培训(63%对63%)中。2017年,项目主任认为IPE对项目管理的挑战性低于2014年(在1至5分的量表上,1表示完全没有挑战性:3.31对3.62;p=0.022)。然而,回复的主任们并不认为IPE在2017年对该行业像2014年的受访者所报告的那样重要(3.29对3.88;p<0.001)。2017年的大多数人同意/强烈同意标准2-15将提升牙科保健作为医疗保健团队一部分的形象(77%),并有助于将牙科保健纳入跨专业护理(IPC)团队(78%)。总体而言,本研究发现2016年引入明确的IPE牙科保健CODA标准仅一年后就已经产生了变化。然而,回复的项目主任对关于其毕业生与IPC相关能力的陈述的较低认同度值得进一步关注。