Hoskin Eileen R, Johnsen David C, Saksena Yun, Horvath Zsuzsa, de Peralta Tracy, Fleisher Neal, Marshall Teresa A, Leone Cataldo
Eileen R. Hoskin is Director, Division of Operative Dentistry, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine; David C. Johnsen is Dean, University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; Yun Saksena is Associate Dean for Education and Associate Professor, Adult Restorative Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center College of Dentistry; Zsuzsa Horvath is Assistant Professor and Director of Faculty Development, University of Pittsburgh School of Dental Medicine; Tracy de Peralta is Clinical Associate Professor, University of Michigan School of Dentistry; Neal Fleisher is Clinical Professor of General Dentistry, Director of Predoctoral Periodontology, and Director of Faculty Development, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University; Teresa A. Marshall is Associate Professor, Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Iowa College of Dentistry & Dental Clinics; and Cataldo Leone is Associate Dean for Academic Affairs and Professor of Periodontology, Henry M. Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University.
J Dent Educ. 2019 Jan;83(1):79-87. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.010.
The aim of this study was to seek the views of a national sample of dental educators regarding the importance of learning domains in dental education, their defined outcomes of those domains, and their perceived effectiveness of their schools in guiding learning in those domains. The study defined the educational domains important for training future dentists as knowledge, technical skills, critical thinking, ethics, social responsibility, and interprofessional education/practice (IPE/IPP). A survey of members of the American Dental Education Association (ADEA) Special Interest Group on the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning was conducted in 2017. In addition to reporting their demographics, participants were asked to rate and rank the importance of each learning domain as well as answer open-ended questions. Of the 89 respondents (response rate 12.5%), 31% were course directors, and 48% had been dental faculty members for more than ten years. Knowledge was ranked as the most important domain, followed by critical thinking, technical skills, clinical decision making, ethics, problem-solving, social responsibility, and finally IPE/IPP. When rating the absolute importance of these domains in the training of dental students, the respondents gave all but IPE/IPP and social responsibility the highest rating. Knowledge and technical skills were rated highest for respondents' confidence in defining student outcomes with similar high ratings for their confidence in guiding this learning. There was little consensus concerning a definition of critical thinking, and a third of the respondents were uncertain of specific learning outcomes for it. Participants expressed even less confidence in defining outcomes for ethics, IPE/IPP, and social responsibility. This baseline information will be used for a future in-depth study to aid in the development of strategies for articulating outcomes, guiding learning, and assessing performance in U.S. dental schools.
本研究的目的是征求全国范围内牙科教育工作者的意见,了解学习领域在牙科教育中的重要性、这些领域所定义的成果,以及他们对所在学校在指导这些领域学习方面的感知有效性。该研究将对培养未来牙医至关重要的教育领域定义为知识、技术技能、批判性思维、伦理、社会责任以及跨专业教育/实践(IPE/IPP)。2017年对美国牙科教育协会(ADEA)教学与学习学术研究特别兴趣小组的成员进行了一项调查。除了报告他们的人口统计学信息外,参与者还被要求对每个学习领域的重要性进行评分和排序,并回答开放式问题。在89名受访者中(回复率为12.5%),31%是课程主任,48%担任牙科教员超过十年。知识被列为最重要的领域,其次是批判性思维、技术技能、临床决策、伦理、问题解决、社会责任,最后是IPE/IPP。在对这些领域在牙科学生培训中的绝对重要性进行评分时,除了IPE/IPP和社会责任外,受访者对其他领域都给出了最高评分。对于受访者在定义学生成果方面的信心,知识和技术技能的评分最高,在指导这种学习方面的信心也得到了类似的高评分。对于批判性思维的定义几乎没有达成共识,三分之一的受访者不确定其具体的学习成果。参与者对定义伦理、IPE/IPP和社会责任的成果的信心更低。这些基线信息将用于未来的深入研究,以帮助制定美国牙科学校明确成果、指导学习和评估表现的策略。