Suppr超能文献

维生素 D 缺乏症筛查:是否具有成本效益?

Screening for hypovitaminosis D: cost-effective or not?

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Disciplines, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

Clinical and Experimental Endocrinology, KU, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Endocrinol. 2019 Mar 1;180(3):D1-D7. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0977.

Abstract

Few topics have elicited more emotion than the issue of screening for vitamin D status and the discussion on the need for global supplementation with vitamin D metabolites. The importance of the problem is highlighted by the USPSTF posted draft research plan with the aim of making an update recommendations statement, possibly next year. Here, we discuss two different viewpoints on screening for vitamin D status: for and against. In the literature there are scientifically sound opinions supporting pro and cons positions. However, we believe that the best way to definitively elucidate this issue is the implementation of a randomized controlled trial evaluating clinical outcomes or harms in persons screened versus those not screened for vitamin D deficiency. The feasibility of such a trial is probably questionable owing to uncertainties still present concerning threshold for vitamin D sufficiency and end points (that is, for example, improved bone mineral density, reduced risk of falls and so on) to be reached.

摘要

几乎没有任何话题能像维生素 D 状态筛查问题以及关于是否需要全球补充维生素 D 代谢物的讨论那样引发如此多的情绪。USPSTF 发布的研究计划草案旨在更新推荐声明,这凸显了该问题的重要性,可能会在明年进行。在这里,我们讨论了两种不同的维生素 D 状态筛查观点:赞成和反对。文献中有科学依据的观点支持正反两方面的立场。然而,我们认为,要彻底阐明这个问题,最好的方法是实施一项随机对照试验,评估筛查维生素 D 缺乏症与不筛查的人群的临床结局或危害。由于关于维生素 D 充足的阈值和终点(例如,骨密度增加、跌倒风险降低等)仍存在不确定性,因此进行这样的试验可能存在疑问。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验