Jin Guang-Zhen, Kim Hae-Won
1Institute of Tissue Regeneration Engineering (ITREN), Dankook University, 119 Dandae-ro, Dongnam-gu, Cheonan, 31116 Korea.
2Department of Nanobiomedical Science and BK21 PLUS NBM Global Research Center for Regenerative Medicine, Dankook University, Cheonan, 31116 Korea.
Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2017 Nov 24;15(2):163-172. doi: 10.1007/s13770-017-0094-6. eCollection 2018 Apr.
For the cartilage repair, the cell sources currently adopted are primarily chondrocytes or mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Due to the fact that chondrocytes dedifferentiate during 2-dimensional (2D) expansion, MSCs are generally more studied and considered to have higher potential for cartilage repair purposes. Here we question if the dedifferentiated chondrocytes can regain the chondrogenic potential, to find potential applications in cartilage repair. For this we chose chondrocytes at passage 12 (considered to have sufficiently dedifferentiated) and the expression of chondrogenic phenotypes and matrix syntheses were examined over 14 days. In particular, the chondrogenic potential of MSCs was also compared. Results showed that the dedifferentiated chondrocytes proliferated actively over 14 days with almost 2.5-fold increase relative to MSCs. Moreover, the chondrogenic ability of chondrocytes was significantly higher than that of MSCs, as confirmed by the expression of a series of mRNA levels and the production of cartilage extracellular matrix molecules in 2D-monolayer and 3-dimensional (3D)-spheroid cultures. Of note, the significance was higher in 3D-culture than in 2D-culture. Although more studies are needed such as the use of different cell passages and human cell source, and the chondrogenic confirmation under conditions, this study showing that the dedifferentiated chondrocytes can also be a suitable cell source for the cell-based cartilage repair, as a counterpart of MSCs, will encourage further studies regarding this issue.
对于软骨修复,目前采用的细胞来源主要是软骨细胞或间充质干细胞(MSCs)。由于软骨细胞在二维(2D)扩增过程中会去分化,因此对MSCs的研究通常更多,并且被认为在软骨修复方面具有更高的潜力。在此,我们质疑去分化的软骨细胞是否能够恢复软骨生成潜力,以寻找其在软骨修复中的潜在应用。为此,我们选择了第12代的软骨细胞(被认为已充分去分化),并在14天内检测了软骨生成表型的表达和基质合成情况。特别地,还比较了MSCs的软骨生成潜力。结果表明,去分化的软骨细胞在14天内积极增殖,相对于MSCs增加了近2.5倍。此外,软骨细胞的软骨生成能力明显高于MSCs,这在二维单层和三维(3D)球体培养中一系列mRNA水平的表达以及软骨细胞外基质分子的产生得到了证实。值得注意的是,3D培养中的显著性高于2D培养。尽管还需要更多的研究,如使用不同的细胞传代和人类细胞来源,以及在特定条件下进行软骨生成确认,但这项研究表明,作为MSCs的对应物,去分化的软骨细胞也可以成为基于细胞的软骨修复的合适细胞来源,这将鼓励对此问题的进一步研究。