Manasse Stephanie M, Clark Kelsey E, Juarascio Adrienne S, Forman Evan M
Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Sciences (WELL Center), Drexel University, Stratton Hall, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Department of Psychology and WELL Center, Drexel University, Stratton Hall, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Dec;24(6):983-995. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0632-9. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
The present manuscript describes the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and its potential applications to treatments for eating disorders (EDs). The manuscript describes the three phases of MOST, discusses a hypothetical case example of how MOST could be applied to developing a disseminable ED treatment, and reviews the pros and cons of the MOST approach. Outcomes from treatments for EDs leave room for improvement. However, traditional methods of treatment development and evaluation (i.e., the treatment package approach) make it challenging to determine how best to improve ED treatments. For example, testing full treatment packages in open trials and RCTs without systematic testing of each component is inefficient (as it is unknown which components are effective), and often does not provide concrete future directions for optimization of the treatment. Much stands to be gained by optimizing treatments in the early stages before testing them in open trials or RCTs. MOST is an alternative, engineering-inspired research framework that is well-suited to address the issues of inefficiency associated with the treatment package approach. MOST entails identifying the most promising treatment components for inclusion in interventions, then eliminating or deemphasizing less efficacious/inert components. This strategy results in a treatment comprised of only effective components that can then be tested via RCT. Though the MOST approach has limitations, it has the potential to greatly benefit ED treatment research and is worthy of application in the field.
本手稿描述了多阶段优化策略(MOST)及其在饮食失调(EDs)治疗中的潜在应用。该手稿描述了MOST的三个阶段,讨论了一个关于MOST如何应用于开发可传播的ED治疗方法的假设案例,并回顾了MOST方法的优缺点。EDs治疗的结果仍有改进空间。然而,传统的治疗开发和评估方法(即治疗包方法)使得确定如何最好地改进ED治疗具有挑战性。例如,在开放试验和随机对照试验(RCT)中测试完整的治疗包,而不对每个组成部分进行系统测试是低效的(因为不知道哪些组成部分是有效的),并且通常不能为治疗优化提供具体的未来方向。在开放试验或RCT中测试之前的早期阶段优化治疗方法可以带来很多好处。MOST是一种受工程启发的替代研究框架,非常适合解决与治疗包方法相关的低效问题。MOST需要确定最有前景的治疗组成部分以纳入干预措施,然后消除或淡化效果较差/无效的组成部分。这种策略产生一种仅由有效组成部分构成的治疗方法,然后可以通过RCT进行测试。虽然MOST方法有局限性,但它有可能极大地有益于ED治疗研究,值得在该领域应用。