Suppr超能文献

开发更高效、有效且可传播的饮食失调治疗方法:多阶段优化策略概述

Developing more efficient, effective, and disseminable treatments for eating disorders: an overview of the multiphase optimization strategy.

作者信息

Manasse Stephanie M, Clark Kelsey E, Juarascio Adrienne S, Forman Evan M

机构信息

Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Sciences (WELL Center), Drexel University, Stratton Hall, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

Department of Psychology and WELL Center, Drexel University, Stratton Hall, 3141 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Eat Weight Disord. 2019 Dec;24(6):983-995. doi: 10.1007/s40519-018-0632-9. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Abstract

The present manuscript describes the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) and its potential applications to treatments for eating disorders (EDs). The manuscript describes the three phases of MOST, discusses a hypothetical case example of how MOST could be applied to developing a disseminable ED treatment, and reviews the pros and cons of the MOST approach. Outcomes from treatments for EDs leave room for improvement. However, traditional methods of treatment development and evaluation (i.e., the treatment package approach) make it challenging to determine how best to improve ED treatments. For example, testing full treatment packages in open trials and RCTs without systematic testing of each component is inefficient (as it is unknown which components are effective), and often does not provide concrete future directions for optimization of the treatment. Much stands to be gained by optimizing treatments in the early stages before testing them in open trials or RCTs. MOST is an alternative, engineering-inspired research framework that is well-suited to address the issues of inefficiency associated with the treatment package approach. MOST entails identifying the most promising treatment components for inclusion in interventions, then eliminating or deemphasizing less efficacious/inert components. This strategy results in a treatment comprised of only effective components that can then be tested via RCT. Though the MOST approach has limitations, it has the potential to greatly benefit ED treatment research and is worthy of application in the field.

摘要

本手稿描述了多阶段优化策略(MOST)及其在饮食失调(EDs)治疗中的潜在应用。该手稿描述了MOST的三个阶段,讨论了一个关于MOST如何应用于开发可传播的ED治疗方法的假设案例,并回顾了MOST方法的优缺点。EDs治疗的结果仍有改进空间。然而,传统的治疗开发和评估方法(即治疗包方法)使得确定如何最好地改进ED治疗具有挑战性。例如,在开放试验和随机对照试验(RCT)中测试完整的治疗包,而不对每个组成部分进行系统测试是低效的(因为不知道哪些组成部分是有效的),并且通常不能为治疗优化提供具体的未来方向。在开放试验或RCT中测试之前的早期阶段优化治疗方法可以带来很多好处。MOST是一种受工程启发的替代研究框架,非常适合解决与治疗包方法相关的低效问题。MOST需要确定最有前景的治疗组成部分以纳入干预措施,然后消除或淡化效果较差/无效的组成部分。这种策略产生一种仅由有效组成部分构成的治疗方法,然后可以通过RCT进行测试。虽然MOST方法有局限性,但它有可能极大地有益于ED治疗研究,值得在该领域应用。

相似文献

3
Applying the Multiphase Optimization Strategy for the Development of Optimized Interventions in Palliative Care.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Jul;62(1):174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.017. Epub 2020 Nov 28.
4
Is enhanced cognitive behavioral therapy an effective intervention in eating disorders? A review.
J Evid Inf Soc Work. 2015;12(3):272-88. doi: 10.1080/15433714.2013.835756. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
5
Treatment of binge eating disorder.
Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2011 Dec;34(4):773-83. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2011.08.011. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
6
Randomized controlled psychotherapy trials in eating disorders: Improving their conduct, interpretation and usefulness.
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Jul;51(7):629-636. doi: 10.1002/eat.22872. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
7
Adapting dose-response methodology to improve clinical trial design for psychotherapies.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Jun;57(6):1322-1329. doi: 10.1002/eat.24120. Epub 2023 Dec 22.
8
A systematic review of evidence for psychological treatments in eating disorders: 2005-2012.
Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Jul;46(5):462-9. doi: 10.1002/eat.22103.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Rates of abstinence following psychological or behavioral treatments for binge-eating disorder: Meta-analysis.
Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Aug;51(8):785-797. doi: 10.1002/eat.22897. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
3
Emotion Regulation as a Transdiagnostic Feature Among Eating Disorders: Cross-sectional and Longitudinal Approach.
Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2018 Jan;26(1):53-61. doi: 10.1002/erv.2570. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
4
The efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for eating disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Nov;85(11):1080-1094. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000245.
5
A network analysis investigation of the cognitive-behavioral theory of eating disorders.
Behav Res Ther. 2017 Oct;97:213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
7
Implementing Clinical Research Using Factorial Designs: A Primer.
Behav Ther. 2017 Jul;48(4):567-580. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2016.12.005. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
8
A meta-analysis of the relation between therapeutic alliance and treatment outcome in eating disorders.
Int J Eat Disord. 2017 Apr;50(4):323-340. doi: 10.1002/eat.22672. Epub 2017 Feb 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验