Suppr超能文献

支付方式改革、药物使用和费用:我们能否承受不考虑药物?

Payment Reform, Medication Use, and Costs: Can We Afford to Leave Out Drugs?

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Center for High-Value Health Care and Center for Value-Based Pharmacy Initiatives, UPMC Health Plan, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Mar;34(3):473-476. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4794-y. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Abstract

Medications are one of the fastest growing sources of costs in the health system and the cornerstone of disease management. Despite extensive attention around drug pricing, medications have largely been excluded from CMS-derived, value-based payment models. In this perspective, we synthesize evidence about the impact of three prominent models-primary care-based redesign, ACOs, and bundled payment programs-on medication use, adherence, and costs. We also examine the literature describing similar models implemented by private payors and their relationship with medication use and costs. The exclusion of drug costs from payment reform model design has led to missed opportunities for payors and providers to prioritize effective medication management strategies and has limited our learning about the effects on cost and quality. New CMS-based models are starting to allow greater flexibility in pharmacy benefit design and reward improved medication therapy management. Additionally, health plans, pharmacies, and pharmacy benefit managers are beginning to partner on collaborative value-based pharmacy initiatives. Taken together, these efforts encourage a paradigm shift around drug cost management that more deeply integrates pharmacy into payment and delivery reform with the goal of improving quality and reducing the total cost of care.

摘要

药物是医疗系统中成本增长最快的来源之一,也是疾病管理的基石。尽管人们对药品定价给予了广泛关注,但药物在很大程度上被排除在 CMS 衍生的基于价值的支付模式之外。在这篇观点文章中,我们综合了关于三种主要模式(以初级保健为基础的重新设计、ACO 和捆绑支付计划)对药物使用、依从性和成本的影响的证据。我们还研究了描述私营支付者实施类似模式及其与药物使用和成本关系的文献。将药物成本排除在支付改革模型设计之外,使得支付者和提供者错失了优先考虑有效药物管理策略的机会,并限制了我们对成本和质量影响的了解。新的基于 CMS 的模型开始允许在药房福利设计方面有更大的灵活性,并奖励改善的药物治疗管理。此外,健康计划、药房和药房福利管理者开始在合作的基于价值的药房计划上开展合作。总之,这些努力鼓励围绕药物成本管理的范式转变,将药房更深入地融入支付和交付改革,以提高质量并降低总体医疗成本。

相似文献

9
Pharmacy performance while providing continuous medication monitoring.提供持续药物监测时的药房绩效。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 Nov-Dec;57(6):692-697. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Aug 24.
10
Design and impact of bundled payment for detox and follow-up care.捆绑支付在戒毒和随访护理中的设计和影响。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Nov;82:113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.09.012. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

本文引用的文献

3
Cost of Joint Replacement Using Bundled Payment Models.采用打包付费模式的关节置换成本。
JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):214-222. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8263.
7
Two-Year Costs and Quality in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative.综合初级保健倡议的两年成本和质量。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jun 16;374(24):2345-56. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa1414953. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验