School of Health Sciences and Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, UK.
Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 May;24(2):265-281. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12352. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
The cortisol awakening response (CAR) and cortisol reactivity to an acute laboratory stressor both involve steep increases in cortisol secretion and are associated with preparing the body to deal with stressors ahead. Alterations in both have been linked to negative clinical and health outcomes. However, these two aspects of our biological stress response have rarely been directly compared, and the extant research focuses on state, rather than trait CAR. Given the similar roles of the CAR and cortisol reactivity, and their relationships to psychopathology, it is important to understand whether trait CAR and cortisol reactivity to acute stressors are related and whether a blunted CAR may be predictive of blunted cortisol reactivity across an acute laboratory stress task.
Cross-sectional. Participants completed the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) the week after daily assessment of the CAR.
Salivary cortisol secretion across the TSST was compared to the CAR, sampled across five weekdays at waking (S1) and 30 min past waking, for 54 female participants.
A smaller CAR, lower peak cortisol, and blunted CAR increase were all significantly related to a steep rise and flattened slope of recovery in cortisol secretion following the TSST. Additionally, lower S1 was predictive of a blunted rise in cortisol secretion from baseline to immediately post-task.
There was a significant relationship between trait CAR and cortisol secretion across the TSST. The results provided mixed support for hypotheses. A blunted CAR was associated with impaired recovery in cortisol secretion following the TSST, but, surprisingly, a rapid rise in cortisol peaking immediately following the stress task. Statement of contribution What is already known on this subject? The CAR and cortisol reactivity to an acute laboratory stress task both are thought to marshal the body's resources to deal with stress. Both the CAR and cortisol reactivity have been related to psychosocial states and clinical and health outcomes in past research. State CAR has been linked to cortisol reactivity to stressors, and a greater CAR is thought to help an individual deal with stressors in the day ahead. What does this study add? The current study predicts trait CAR sampled across multiple days from the rise and recovery in cortisol secretion across an acute stress test. Comparison of trait CAR and cortisol reactivity may clarify both their relationship to each other and to clinical and health outcomes.
皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR)和皮质醇对急性实验室应激的反应都涉及皮质醇分泌的急剧增加,与身体为应对未来的应激源做准备有关。这两者的变化都与负面的临床和健康结果有关。然而,这两个方面的生物应激反应很少被直接比较,现有的研究侧重于状态,而不是特质 CAR。鉴于 CAR 和皮质醇对急性应激的反应具有相似的作用,以及它们与精神病理学的关系,了解特质 CAR 和急性应激源的皮质醇反应是否相关,以及 CAR 迟钝是否可以预测急性实验室应激任务中皮质醇反应迟钝是很重要的。
横断面研究。参与者在完成每日 CAR 评估后的一周内完成了特里尔社会应激测试(TSST)。
对 54 名女性参与者的 TSST 期间的唾液皮质醇分泌与 CAR 进行了比较,CAR 是在五个工作日醒来时(S1)和醒来后 30 分钟采集的。
CAR 较小、峰值皮质醇较低和 CAR 增加减弱均与 TSST 后皮质醇分泌的急剧上升和斜率平坦化显著相关。此外,S1 较低可预测从基线到任务后即刻皮质醇分泌的上升减弱。
特质 CAR 和 TSST 期间的皮质醇分泌之间存在显著关系。结果对假设提供了混合支持。CAR 减弱与 TSST 后皮质醇分泌恢复受损有关,但令人惊讶的是,应激任务后皮质醇迅速上升。
关于这个主题,目前已经知道什么?CAR 和皮质醇对急性实验室应激任务的反应都被认为是调动身体资源来应对压力。在过去的研究中,CAR 和皮质醇对急性应激的反应都与心理社会状态以及临床和健康结果有关。状态 CAR 与应激源的皮质醇反应有关,较大的 CAR 被认为有助于个体应对未来一天的应激源。本研究有何补充?本研究预测了从急性应激测试中皮质醇的上升和恢复中采样的多天特质 CAR。特质 CAR 和皮质醇反应的比较可以澄清它们彼此之间以及与临床和健康结果的关系。