• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)方案化疗后 90 天内肾功能不全预测早期和晚期死亡率。

Renal dysfunction within 90 days of FluBu4 predicts early and late mortality.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Cancer Center, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jul;54(7):980-986. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0361-8. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1038/s41409-018-0361-8
PMID:30604772
Abstract

Myeloablative conditioning regimens with significant extramedullary toxicity result in high rates of renal dysfunction including acute kidney injury (AKI). Here we examine the incidence and impact of a reduced creatinine clearance (below 60 ml/min) before day 90 (early renal dysfunction, ERD) in patients receiving the reduced toxicity fludarabine/i.v. busulfan (FluBu4) regimen prior to allogeneic transplant. Of 91 patients receiving FluBu4, 62 (68%) developed ERD. ERD resulted in worse overall survival (OS, 2.2 years versus median not reached, p = 0.04) and progression-free survival (PFS, 1.6 years versus median not reached, p = 0.02). This was due to a higher relapse rate (34% versus 14%, p = 0.03) in the ERD group. In time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, ERD was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-4.21, p = 0.043) and PFS (HR 2.52, 95% CI 1.17-4.28, p = 0.030). Patients with ERD surviving 1 year had an increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD, OR 10; 95% CI 1.4-112.6, p = 0.0181), which was associated with worse survival (3.2 years versus median not reached, p = 0.002). ERD after FluBu4 is therefore a poor prognostic sign resulting in increased relapse, worse OS, and high risk of CKD at 1 year.

摘要

在接受异体移植前接受低毒性氟达拉滨/静脉注射白消安(FluBu4)方案的患者中,我们检查了第 90 天(早期肾功能障碍,ERD)前肌酐清除率(低于 60ml/min)降低的发生率和影响。在接受 FluBu4 的 91 名患者中,有 62 名(68%)发生 ERD。ERD 导致总生存率(OS,2.2 年与未达到中位数,p=0.04)和无进展生存率(PFS,1.6 年与未达到中位数,p=0.02)更差。这是由于 ERD 组的复发率更高(34%比 14%,p=0.03)。在调整年龄的时间依赖性 Cox 比例风险模型中,ERD 与更差的 OS(风险比[HR]2.67,95%置信区间[CI]1.06-4.21,p=0.043)和 PFS(HR 2.52,95%CI 1.17-4.28,p=0.030)相关。ERD 存活 1 年的患者发生慢性肾脏病(CKD)的风险增加(OR 10;95%CI 1.4-112.6,p=0.0181),这与更差的生存相关(3.2 年与未达到中位数,p=0.002)。因此,FluBu4 后 ERD 是预后不良的标志,导致复发增加、OS 更差和 1 年内 CKD 风险增加。

相似文献

1
Renal dysfunction within 90 days of FluBu4 predicts early and late mortality.氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙和伊立替康(FOLFIRI)方案化疗后 90 天内肾功能不全预测早期和晚期死亡率。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jul;54(7):980-986. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0361-8. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
Similar survival but increased toxicity with a sequential versus concurrent FluBu4 regimen.与序贯氟尿嘧啶/顺铂方案相比,同步氟尿嘧啶/顺铂方案生存率相似,但毒性增加。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Sep;53(9):1221-1224. doi: 10.1038/s41409-018-0195-4. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
3
Reducing Treatment-Related Mortality Did Not Improve Outcomes of Allogeneic Myeloablative Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: A University of Michigan Prospective Series.降低治疗相关死亡率并未改善高危多发性骨髓瘤异基因清髓性造血细胞移植的疗效:密歇根大学前瞻性系列研究
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Jan;22(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.07.021. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
4
Allogeneic transplantation with myeloablative FluBu4 conditioning improves survival compared to reduced intensity FluBu2 conditioning for acute myeloid leukemia in remission.与用于缓解期急性髓系白血病的减低剂量FluBu2预处理相比,采用清髓性FluBu4预处理的异基因移植可提高生存率。
Ann Hematol. 2015 Jun;94(6):1033-41. doi: 10.1007/s00277-015-2349-4. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
5
A Comparison of the Myeloablative Conditioning Regimen Fludarabine/Busulfan with Cyclophosphamide/Total Body Irradiation, for Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Modern Era: A Cohort Analysis.在现代时代,异体干细胞移植中氟达拉滨/白消安与环磷酰胺/全身照射的清髓性调理方案比较:队列分析。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 Aug;24(8):1733-1740. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
6
Lowered-intensity preparative regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplantation delays acute graft-versus-host disease but does not improve outcome for advanced hematologic malignancy.异基因干细胞移植的低强度预处理方案可延迟急性移植物抗宿主病,但不能改善晚期血液系统恶性肿瘤的预后。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2003 Mar;9(3):189-97. doi: 10.1053/bbmt.2003.50012.
7
Thiotepa, Busulfan, and Fludarabine Conditioning Regimen in T Cell-Replete HLA-Haploidentical Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.噻替派、白消安和氟达拉滨预处理方案在 T 细胞富含 HLA 单倍体相合造血干细胞移植中的应用。
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Jul;25(7):1407-1415. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
8
Reduced-toxicity conditioning with fludarabine, once-daily intravenous busulfan, and antithymocyte globulins prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation: results of a multicenter prospective phase 2 trial.氟达拉滨、每日一次静脉用白消安和抗胸腺细胞球蛋白预处理的降低毒性条件化方案用于异基因造血干细胞移植:一项多中心前瞻性 2 期试验的结果。
Cancer. 2015 Feb 15;121(4):562-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29087. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
9
Thiotepa, busulfan and fludarabine compared to busulfan and cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen for allogeneic stem cell transplant from matched siblings and unrelated donors for acute myeloid leukemia.噻替哌、白消安和氟达拉滨与白消安和环磷酰胺相比,作为急性髓系白血病患者接受来自匹配的同胞供体和无关供体的异基因干细胞移植的预处理方案。
Am J Hematol. 2018 Oct;93(10):1211-1219. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25225. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
10
Phase II Trial of Graft-versus-Host Disease Prophylaxis with Post-Transplantation Cyclophosphamide after Reduced-Intensity Busulfan/Fludarabine Conditioning for Hematological Malignancies.在采用减低剂量白消安/氟达拉滨预处理方案治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤后,使用移植后环磷酰胺预防移植物抗宿主病的II期试验
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 May;21(5):906-12. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2015.01.026. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Features of Acute Kidney Injury in the Early Post-Transplantation Period Following Reduced-Intensity Conditioning Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.降低强度预处理异基因造血干细胞移植后早期移植肾功能损伤的临床特征。
Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Jul;29(7):455.e1-455.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.03.029. Epub 2023 Apr 2.
2
Need for hemodialysis in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: risk factors and survival in a retrospective cohort.造血干细胞移植患者对血液透析的需求:回顾性队列研究中的危险因素与生存情况
Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2023 Jul-Sep;45(3):297-305. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 May 18.
3
Acute Kidney Injury in Oncology Patients.
肿瘤患者的急性肾损伤
J Cancer. 2020 May 22;11(16):4700-4708. doi: 10.7150/jca.45382. eCollection 2020.
4
Acute kidney injury in the patient with cancer.癌症患者的急性肾损伤
Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2019 Sep 30;38(3):295-308. doi: 10.23876/j.krcp.19.042.