Suppr超能文献

感染性降主动脉移植物和血管内移植物的系统评价。

A systematic review of infected descending thoracic aortic grafts and endografts.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute University School of Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Department of Vascular Surgery, Vita-Salute University School of Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1941-1951.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.108. Epub 2019 Jan 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to collect and critically analyze the current evidence on the modalities and results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic surgical graft (SG) and endograft (EG) infection, which represents a rare but dramatic complication after both surgical and endovascular aortic repair.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic health database search (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library) identified all articles that were published up to October 2017 reporting on thoracic aortic SG or EG infection. Observational studies, multicenter reports, single-center series and case reports, case-control studies, and guidelines were considered eligible if reporting specific results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic SG or EG infection. Comparisons of patients presenting with SG or EG infection and between invasive and conservative treatment were performed. Odds ratio (OR) meta-analyses were run when comparative data were available.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies reporting on 233 patients with infected SG (49) or EG (184) were included. Four were multicenter studies including 107 patients, all with EG infection, associated with a fistula in 91% of cases, with a reported overall survival at 2 years of 16% to 39%. The remaining 39 single-center studies included 49 patients with SG infection and 77 with EG infection. Association with aortoesophageal fistula was significantly more common with EG (60% vs 31%; P = .01). In addition, time interval from index procedure to infection was significantly shorter with EG (17 ± 21 months vs 32 ± 61 months; P = .03). Meta-analysis showed a trend of increased 1-year mortality in patients with SG infection compared with EG infection (pooled OR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-14.7; P = .073). Surgical management with infected graft explantation was associated with a trend toward lower 1-year mortality compared with graft preservation (pooled OR, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.0; P = .056).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracic aortic EG infection is likely to occur more frequently in association with aortoesophageal fistulas and in a shorter time compared with SG infection. Survival is poor in both groups, especially in patients with SG infection. Surgical treatment with graft explantation seems to be the preferable choice in fit patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在收集和批判性分析目前关于降主动脉外科移植物(SG)和血管内移植物(EG)感染治疗方式和结果的证据,这是外科和血管内主动脉修复后罕见但严重的并发症。

方法

通过全面的电子健康数据库搜索(PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Google Scholar 和 Cochrane Library),确定了截至 2017 年 10 月发表的所有报告胸主动脉 SG 或 EG 感染具体治疗结果的文章。观察性研究、多中心报告、单中心系列和病例报告、病例对照研究和指南,如果报告了降主动脉 SG 或 EG 感染的治疗特定结果,则被认为是合格的。对 SG 或 EG 感染患者进行了比较,并对侵袭性治疗和保守治疗进行了比较。当有比较数据时,进行了比值比(OR)荟萃分析。

结果

纳入了 43 项研究,共报告了 233 例感染 SG(49 例)或 EG(184 例)的患者。其中 4 项为多中心研究,共纳入 107 例 EG 感染患者,均合并瘘管,91%的患者有瘘管,2 年总生存率为 16%至 39%。其余 39 项单中心研究包括 49 例 SG 感染患者和 77 例 EG 感染患者。EG 感染更常合并主动脉食管瘘(60%比 31%;P=0.01)。此外,EG 感染的感染至指数手术时间间隔明显较短(17±21 个月比 32±61 个月;P=0.03)。荟萃分析显示,SG 感染患者的 1 年死亡率高于 EG 感染患者(汇总 OR,3.6;95%置信区间,0.9-14.7;P=0.073)。与保留移植物相比,带感染移植物的外科处理与 1 年死亡率降低趋势相关(汇总 OR,0.3;95%置信区间,0.1-1.0;P=0.056)。

结论

与 SG 感染相比,胸主动脉 EG 感染更可能与主动脉食管瘘相关,且发生时间更短。两组患者的生存率均较差,尤其是 SG 感染患者。对于健康患者,带感染移植物的外科治疗似乎是首选。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验