Division of General Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Apr;57(4):731-737. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.12.338. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
Opportunities for patients to receive unnecessary, costly, and potentially harmful care near the end of life abound. Advance care planning (ACP) can help to make this vulnerable period better for patients, caregivers, and providers.
The objective of this study was to determine whether older age predicted the presence of certain forms of retrievable ACP documentation in the electronic health record (EHR) in a large sample of hospice-referred patients.
This was a retrospective analysis of medical-record data on 3595 patients referred to hospice between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015. EHR documentation of an ACP note in the problem list, presence of a scanned advance directive, and the presence of a verified do-not-resuscitate order were the outcome measures. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of age, education, race, gender, cancer diagnosis, dementia diagnosis, palliative encounter, and death on the outcome variables.
Our results suggest that when we control for prognosis, patients over age 70 years may experience gaps in ACP communication. We found that as patients age, the odds of having documentation of a conversation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56; P < 0.001) or scanned advance directive decreased (OR = 0.63; P < 0.001), while the odds of having a verified do-not-resuscitate order increased (OR = 1.42; P < 0.001).
The results of this study may imply some degree of unilateral and physician-driven decision making for end-of-life care among older adults. Collaborative efforts between an interdisciplinary medical team should focus on developing policies to address this potential disparity between younger and older adults at the end of life.
在生命末期,患者接受不必要、昂贵且潜在有害治疗的机会比比皆是。预先医疗指示(ACP)有助于使这一脆弱时期对患者、护理人员和医护人员更好。
本研究的目的是确定在大量接受临终关怀转诊的患者中,年龄较大是否预示着电子健康记录(EHR)中存在某些可检索的 ACP 文档。
这是对 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 12 月 31 日期间转诊至临终关怀的 3595 名患者的病历数据进行的回顾性分析。EHR 记录中问题清单上的 ACP 记录、扫描的预先医疗指示以及验证的不复苏医嘱的存在是结果测量指标。使用逻辑回归来评估年龄、教育、种族、性别、癌症诊断、痴呆诊断、姑息治疗、以及死亡对结果变量的影响。
我们的结果表明,当我们控制预后时,70 岁以上的患者可能会在 ACP 沟通方面存在差距。我们发现,随着患者年龄的增长,记录对话的几率(优势比[OR] = 0.56;P < 0.001)或扫描的预先医疗指示减少(OR = 0.63;P < 0.001),而验证的不复苏医嘱的几率增加(OR = 1.42;P < 0.001)。
这项研究的结果可能意味着在老年人中,临终关怀存在某种程度的单方面和医生驱动的决策。跨学科医疗团队之间的协作努力应侧重于制定政策,以解决生命末期年轻和老年人之间的这种潜在差距。