Medical Department IV - Grosshadern, University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Medical Department IV - Grosshadern, University Munich, Munich, Germany.
Pathology. 2019 Feb;51(2):227-232. doi: 10.1016/j.pathol.2018.10.016. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-c) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are independent cardiovascular risk factors. Reduction of LDL-c leads to reduction in cardiovascular events, regardless of the method of reducing LDL-c levels. Lifestyle modification and drugs are first line treatment options. However, many patients do not reach treatment goals, as defined in guidelines worldwide, through standard medication. So far, drugs are not efficient in lowering Lp(a) levels, or the reduction of plasma levels does not result in clinical benefit. In these two groups of patients lipoprotein apheresis is very efficient in decreasing LDL-c and Lp(a) levels. A single apheresis session can decrease LDL-c and Lp(a) by approximately 65%, and apheresis performed weekly or biweekly results in considerably decreased mean interval concentrations (approximately 30% reduction). Most apheresis systems (HELP, heparin induced extracorporeal LDL precipitation; DALI, direct adsorption of lipoproteins; lipoprotein apheresis with dextran sulfate; lipid filtration; immunoadsorption) decrease LDL-c and Lp(a). Lipopac is a specific form of immunapheresis and only decreases Lp(a). Lipoprotein apheresis is a well-tolerated treatment option but it is expensive and time consuming. The evidence for clinical benefit through regular apheresis comes from observational data. Adequate, randomised, controlled trials are lacking.
低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]是独立的心血管危险因素。降低 LDL-C 可减少心血管事件,无论降低 LDL-C 水平的方法如何。生活方式改变和药物是一线治疗选择。然而,许多患者无法通过标准药物达到全球指南定义的治疗目标。迄今为止,尚无药物能有效降低 Lp(a)水平,或降低血浆水平不会带来临床获益。在这两组患者中,脂蛋白吸附术非常有效地降低 LDL-C 和 Lp(a)水平。单次吸附术可使 LDL-C 和 Lp(a)降低约 65%,每周或每两周进行一次吸附术可使平均间隔浓度显著降低(约降低 30%)。大多数吸附系统(HELP,肝素诱导的体外 LDL 沉淀;DALI,脂蛋白的直接吸附;用葡聚糖硫酸盐进行脂蛋白吸附;脂质过滤;免疫吸附)降低 LDL-C 和 Lp(a)。Lipopac 是免疫吸附的一种特殊形式,仅降低 Lp(a)。脂蛋白吸附术是一种耐受性良好的治疗选择,但费用高且耗时。通过定期吸附术获得临床获益的证据来自观察性数据。缺乏充分的随机对照试验。